GNR vs SCHF: Holdings Overlap
GNRState Street® SPDR® S&P® Global Natural Resources ETF
State Street (SPDR) · 94 holdings · $4.8B · as of 2026-08-06
SCHFSchwab International Equity ETF
Schwab · 1476 holdings · $67.5B · as of 2026-05-31
Holdings snapshots are 67 days apart (GNR: 2026-08-06, SCHF: 2026-05-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are GNR and SCHF?
State Street® SPDR® S&P® Global Natural Resources ETF (GNR, by State Street (SPDR)) holds 94 positions; Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF, by Schwab) holds 1476. They have 40 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 6.4% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 6.4%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 40GNR holds 94 · SCHF holds 1476
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- GNR 55%·SCHF 6%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in GNR
54 of 94 positions (44.6% of the fund) are not held by SCHF. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | GNR | SCHF |
|---|---|---|
| Materials | 57.3% | 6.4% |
| Energy | 32.0% | 4.4% |
| Financials | 0.0% | 21.7% |
| Information Technology | 0.0% | 15.5% |
| Industrials | 0.0% | 14.5% |
| Other Sectors | 4.6% | 25.3% |
| Unclassified | 5.5% | 11.5% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (6% of GNR, 12% of SCHF).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GNR | +9.0% | +20.6% | +37.3% | +13.2% | +11.1% | +10.4% | 2.46% |
| SCHF | +2.7% | +18.1% | +30.6% | +20.0% | +10.5% | +10.4% | 2.99% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in GNR vs SCHF →
Shared Holdings(40)
The top 10 shared positions account for 63% of the overlap, led by SHEL, BHP and TTE.
4.37% | 0.80% | 0.80% | |
5.32% | 0.74% | 0.74% | |
3.01% | 0.53% | 0.53% | |
1.89% | 0.37% | 0.37% | |
1.63% | 0.31% | 0.31% | |
2.03% | 0.31% | 0.31% | |
1.74% | 0.27% | 0.27% | |
1.27% | 0.25% | 0.25% | |
1.67% | 0.24% | 0.24% | |
1.37% | 0.21% | 0.21% | |
1.52% | 0.19% | 0.19% | |
0.97% | 0.17% | 0.17% | |
1.11% | 0.16% | 0.16% | |
0.71% | 0.16% | 0.16% | |
1.08% | 0.15% | 0.15% | |
0.73% | 0.14% | 0.14% | |
0.66% | 0.12% | 0.12% | |
0.74% | 0.12% | 0.12% | |
4.70% | 0.11% | 0.11% | |
0.71% | 0.11% | 0.11% | |
0.75% | 0.10% | 0.10% | |
0.56% | 0.09% | 0.09% | |
0.52% | 0.08% | 0.08% | |
0.56% | 0.08% | 0.08% | |
0.49% | 0.07% | 0.07% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do GNR and SCHF overlap?
GNR and SCHF overlap by 6.4% of portfolio weight. They share 40 holdings (GNR holds 94 positions and SCHF holds 1476), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both GNR and SCHF?
The two portfolios are 6.4% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of GNR and SCHF?
The largest positions held by both funds are SHEL, BHP, TTE, BP- and CNQ. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 63% of the total overlap.
What does GNR own that SCHF doesn't?
54 positions (44.6% of GNR) are unique to GNR, led by XOM, NEM and CTVA. In the other direction, 1436 positions (92.9% of SCHF) are unique to SCHF.