GNR vs SCZ: Holdings Overlap
GNRState Street® SPDR® S&P® Global Natural Resources ETF
State Street (SPDR) · 94 holdings · $4.8B · as of 2026-08-06
SCZiShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF
iShares · 2044 holdings · $13.5B · as of 2026-04-30
Holdings snapshots are 98 days apart (GNR: 2026-08-06, SCZ: 2026-04-30). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are GNR and SCZ?
State Street® SPDR® S&P® Global Natural Resources ETF (GNR, by State Street (SPDR)) holds 94 positions; iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF (SCZ, by iShares) holds 2044. They have 3 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 0.4% identical. In practical terms the pair is essentially distinct, holding almost none of the same securities.
- Overlap by Weight
- 0.4%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 3GNR holds 94 · SCZ holds 2044
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- GNR 3%·SCZ 0%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in GNR
91 of 94 positions (96.1% of the fund) are not held by SCZ. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GNR | +9.0% | +20.6% | +37.3% | +13.2% | +11.1% | +10.4% | 2.46% |
| SCZ | +4.1% | +13.5% | +20.2% | +16.6% | +5.9% | +8.6% | 3.07% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in GNR vs SCZ →
Shared Holdings(3)
The top 3 shared positions account for 100% of the overlap, led by SIGN, MNDI and 3861.
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do GNR and SCZ overlap?
GNR and SCZ overlap by 0.4% of portfolio weight. They share 3 holdings (GNR holds 94 positions and SCZ holds 2044), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both GNR and SCZ?
The two portfolios are 0.4% identical by weight. Owning both is genuine diversification: the funds hold almost none of the same securities.
What are the biggest shared holdings of GNR and SCZ?
The largest positions held by both funds are SIGN, MNDI and 3861. Together the top 3 shared positions account for 100% of the total overlap.
What does GNR own that SCZ doesn't?
91 positions (96.1% of GNR) are unique to GNR, led by BHP, NTR and XOM. In the other direction, 2041 positions (98.9% of SCZ) are unique to SCZ.