GPIQ vs VYM: Holdings Overlap
GPIQGoldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Premium Income ETF
Goldman Sachs · 101 holdings · $5.4B · as of 2026-03-31
VYMVanguard High Dividend Yield Index Fund
Vanguard · 608 holdings · $83.4B · as of 2026-04-30
Holdings snapshots are 30 days apart (GPIQ: 2026-03-31, VYM: 2026-04-30). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are GPIQ and VYM?
Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Premium Income ETF (GPIQ, by Goldman Sachs) holds 101 positions; Vanguard High Dividend Yield Index Fund (VYM, by Vanguard) holds 608. They have 28 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 15.5% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 15.5%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 28GPIQ holds 101 · VYM holds 608
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- GPIQ 20%·VYM 21%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in GPIQ
73 of 101 positions (79.9% of the fund) are not held by VYM. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | GPIQ | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 49.5% | 16.7% |
| Financials | 0.2% | 20.6% |
| Communication Services | 15.9% | 3.5% |
| Industrials | 4.0% | 12.7% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 12.6% | 6.4% |
| Other Sectors | 17.3% | 39.6% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts.
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GPIQ | +1.5% | +16.2% | +26.4% | — | — | — | 9.88% |
| VYM | +3.1% | +16.8% | +26.1% | +18.1% | +12.5% | +11.9% | 2.19% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in GPIQ vs VYM →
Shared Holdings(28)
The top 10 shared positions account for 71% of the overlap, led by AVGO, CSCO and TXN.
2.98% | 8.03% | 2.98% | |
1.71% | 1.52% | 1.52% | |
0.98% | 1.06% | 0.98% | |
1.33% | 0.98% | 0.98% | |
1.17% | 0.90% | 0.90% | |
0.89% | 0.82% | 0.82% | |
0.79% | 0.80% | 0.79% | |
1.09% | 0.71% | 0.71% | |
0.99% | 0.68% | 0.68% | |
0.82% | 0.57% | 0.57% | |
0.57% | 0.50% | 0.50% | |
0.57% | 0.41% | 0.41% | |
1.27% | 0.39% | 0.39% | |
0.41% | 0.36% | 0.36% | |
0.46% | 0.33% | 0.33% | |
0.39% | 0.31% | 0.31% | |
0.34% | 0.29% | 0.29% | |
0.28% | 0.31% | 0.28% | |
0.33% | 0.26% | 0.26% | |
0.31% | 0.21% | 0.21% | |
0.27% | 0.20% | 0.20% | |
0.31% | 0.19% | 0.19% | |
0.19% | 0.20% | 0.19% | |
0.32% | 0.17% | 0.17% | |
0.23% | 0.16% | 0.16% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do GPIQ and VYM overlap?
GPIQ and VYM overlap by 15.5% of portfolio weight. They share 28 holdings (GPIQ holds 101 positions and VYM holds 608), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both GPIQ and VYM?
The two portfolios are 15.5% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of GPIQ and VYM?
The largest positions held by both funds are AVGO, CSCO, TXN, LIN and PEP. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 71% of the total overlap.
What does GPIQ own that VYM doesn't?
73 positions (79.9% of GPIQ) are unique to GPIQ, led by NVDA, AAPL and MSFT. In the other direction, 580 positions (78.8% of VYM) are unique to VYM.