GSLC vs IWB: Holdings Overlap
GSLCGoldman Sachs ActiveBeta(R) U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF
Goldman Sachs · 435 holdings · $15.2B · as of 2026-05-31
iShares · 1005 holdings · $49.9B · as of 2026-03-31
Holdings snapshots are 61 days apart (GSLC: 2026-05-31, IWB: 2026-03-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are GSLC and IWB?
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta(R) U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (GSLC, by Goldman Sachs) holds 435 positions; iShares Russell 1000 ETF (IWB, by iShares) holds 1005. They have 424 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 72.8% identical. In practical terms the pair is heavily overlapping, with largely the same stocks driving both funds.
- Overlap by Weight
- 72.8%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 424GSLC holds 435 · IWB holds 1005
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- GSLC 99%·IWB 90%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in GSLC
11 of 435 positions (1.1% of the fund) are not held by IWB.
Only in IWB
581 of 1005 positions (10.2% of the fund) are not held by GSLC. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | GSLC | IWB |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 38.0% | 30.9% |
| Financials | 10.5% | 12.9% |
| Communication Services | 11.0% | 10.2% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 10.1% | 10.0% |
| Industrials | 8.5% | 9.9% |
| Other Sectors | 21.7% | 26.0% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts.
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GSLC | +3.9% | +12.3% | +20.3% | +19.9% | +12.1% | +14.5% | 0.91% |
| IWB | +3.4% | +13.9% | +23.1% | +20.9% | +12.6% | +15.0% | 0.89% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in GSLC vs IWB →
Shared Holdings(424)
The top 10 shared positions account for 45% of the overlap, led by NVDA, AAPL and MSFT.
7.87% | 6.81% | 6.81% | |
7.00% | 6.10% | 6.10% | |
4.87% | 4.58% | 4.58% | |
3.78% | 3.33% | 3.33% | |
3.31% | 2.79% | 2.79% | |
2.84% | 2.39% | 2.39% | |
2.14% | 2.08% | 2.08% | |
1.89% | 2.27% | 1.89% | |
1.28% | 1.75% | 1.28% | |
1.17% | 1.23% | 1.17% | |
1.10% | 1.33% | 1.10% | |
0.85% | 1.47% | 0.85% | |
0.84% | 0.90% | 0.84% | |
0.73% | 0.98% | 0.73% | |
0.70% | 0.85% | 0.70% | |
1.10% | 0.63% | 0.63% | |
0.62% | 1.20% | 0.62% | |
0.61% | 0.67% | 0.61% | |
0.56% | 0.74% | 0.56% | |
0.68% | 0.55% | 0.55% | |
0.59% | 0.52% | 0.52% | |
0.56% | 0.45% | 0.45% | |
0.71% | 0.45% | 0.45% | |
0.39% | 0.55% | 0.39% | |
0.39% | 0.55% | 0.39% |
Showing the top 250 of 424 shared holdings by overlap weight.
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do GSLC and IWB overlap?
GSLC and IWB overlap by 72.8% of portfolio weight. They share 424 holdings (GSLC holds 435 positions and IWB holds 1005), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both GSLC and IWB?
The two portfolios are 72.8% identical by weight. Owning both mostly doubles down on the shared core rather than diversifying: the same large positions drive both funds.
What are the biggest shared holdings of GSLC and IWB?
The largest positions held by both funds are NVDA, AAPL, MSFT, AMZN and GOOGL. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 45% of the total overlap.
What does GSLC own that IWB doesn't?
11 positions (1.1% of GSLC) are unique to GSLC, led by STX, CCL and TEL. In the other direction, 581 positions (10.2% of IWB) are unique to IWB.