ICLN vs IGF: Holdings Overlap
ICLNiShares Global Clean Energy ETF
iShares · 123 holdings · $2.3B · as of 2026-04-30
IGFiShares Global Infrastructure ETF
iShares · 88 holdings · $11.0B · as of 2026-03-31
Holdings snapshots are 30 days apart (ICLN: 2026-04-30, IGF: 2026-03-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are ICLN and IGF?
iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN, by iShares) holds 123 positions; iShares Global Infrastructure ETF (IGF, by iShares) holds 88. They have 11 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 0.1% identical. In practical terms the pair is essentially distinct, holding almost none of the same securities.
- Overlap by Weight
- 0.1%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 11ICLN holds 123 · IGF holds 88
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- ICLN 1%·IGF 0%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in ICLN
112 of 123 positions (98.5% of the fund) are not held by IGF. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | ICLN | IGF |
|---|---|---|
| Utilities | 19.4% | 39.3% |
| Industrials | 32.4% | 18.2% |
| Energy | 1.3% | 20.7% |
| Information Technology | 12.3% | 0.0% |
| Real Estate | 0.1% | 0.1% |
| Other Sectors | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Unclassified | 34.0% | 21.4% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (34% of ICLN, 21% of IGF).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ICLN | -5.3% | +11.7% | +34.9% | +4.0% | -3.1% | +8.9% | 1.01% |
| IGF | -1.8% | +9.0% | +12.6% | +16.5% | +10.6% | +8.0% | 2.93% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in ICLN vs IGF →
Shared Holdings(11)
The top 10 shared positions account for 100% of the overlap, led by 6WX, Euro and HONG KONG DOLLAR.
0.84% | 0.07% | 0.07% | |
| Euro | 0.02% | 0.01% | 0.01% |
| HONG KONG DOLLAR | 0.02% | 0.01% | 0.01% |
| CANADIAN DOLLAR | 0.00% | 0.02% | 0.00% |
| GREAT BRITISH POUND | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| JAPANESE YEN | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| DANISH KRONER | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| NORWEGIAN KRONE | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| NEW ZEALAND DOLLAR | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| KOREAN WON | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| SWISS FRANC | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do ICLN and IGF overlap?
ICLN and IGF overlap by 0.1% of portfolio weight. They share 11 holdings (ICLN holds 123 positions and IGF holds 88), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both ICLN and IGF?
The two portfolios are 0.1% identical by weight. Owning both is genuine diversification: the funds hold almost none of the same securities.
What are the biggest shared holdings of ICLN and IGF?
The largest positions held by both funds are 6WX, Euro, HONG KONG DOLLAR, CANADIAN DOLLAR and GREAT BRITISH POUND. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 100% of the total overlap.
What does ICLN own that IGF doesn't?
112 positions (98.5% of ICLN) are unique to ICLN, led by BE, NXT and FSLR. In the other direction, 77 positions (99.6% of IGF) are unique to IGF.