ICLN vs IJS: Holdings Overlap
ICLNiShares Global Clean Energy ETF
iShares · 123 holdings · $2.3B · as of 2026-04-30
IJSiShares S&P Small-Cap 600 Value ETF
iShares · 458 holdings · $8.4B · as of 2026-03-31
Holdings snapshots are 30 days apart (ICLN: 2026-04-30, IJS: 2026-03-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are ICLN and IJS?
iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN, by iShares) holds 123 positions; iShares S&P Small-Cap 600 Value ETF (IJS, by iShares) holds 458. They have 3 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 0.8% identical. In practical terms the pair is essentially distinct, holding almost none of the same securities.
- Overlap by Weight
- 0.8%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 3ICLN holds 123 · IJS holds 458
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- ICLN 6%·IJS 1%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in ICLN
120 of 123 positions (93.8% of the fund) are not held by IJS. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | ICLN | IJS |
|---|---|---|
| Industrials | 32.4% | 12.4% |
| Financials | 0.0% | 20.6% |
| Utilities | 19.4% | 2.6% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 0.0% | 15.4% |
| Information Technology | 12.3% | 9.8% |
| Other Sectors | 1.3% | 36.8% |
| Unclassified | 34.0% | 0.9% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (34% of ICLN, 1% of IJS).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ICLN | -5.3% | +11.7% | +34.9% | +4.0% | -3.1% | +8.9% | 1.01% |
| IJS | +3.6% | +23.1% | +39.5% | +13.6% | +8.2% | +10.2% | 1.29% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in ICLN vs IJS →
Shared Holdings(3)
The top 3 shared positions account for 100% of the overlap, led by ENPH, SEDG and REX.
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do ICLN and IJS overlap?
ICLN and IJS overlap by 0.8% of portfolio weight. They share 3 holdings (ICLN holds 123 positions and IJS holds 458), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both ICLN and IJS?
The two portfolios are 0.8% identical by weight. Owning both is genuine diversification: the funds hold almost none of the same securities.
What are the biggest shared holdings of ICLN and IJS?
The largest positions held by both funds are ENPH, SEDG and REX. Together the top 3 shared positions account for 100% of the total overlap.
What does ICLN own that IJS doesn't?
120 positions (93.8% of ICLN) are unique to ICLN, led by BE, NXT and FSLR. In the other direction, 455 positions (97.7% of IJS) are unique to IJS.