ICLN vs KOMP: Holdings Overlap
ICLNiShares Global Clean Energy ETF
iShares · 123 holdings · $2.3B · as of 2026-04-30
KOMPState Street® SPDR® S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF
State Street (SPDR) · 501 holdings · $2.6B · as of 2026-08-06
Holdings snapshots are 98 days apart (ICLN: 2026-04-30, KOMP: 2026-08-06). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are ICLN and KOMP?
iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN, by iShares) holds 123 positions; State Street® SPDR® S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF (KOMP, by State Street (SPDR)) holds 501. They have 12 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 2.9% identical. In practical terms the pair is essentially distinct, holding almost none of the same securities.
- Overlap by Weight
- 2.9%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 12ICLN holds 123 · KOMP holds 501
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- ICLN 42%·KOMP 3%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in ICLN
111 of 123 positions (57.5% of the fund) are not held by KOMP. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Only in KOMP
489 of 501 positions (96.9% of the fund) are not held by ICLN. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | ICLN | KOMP |
|---|---|---|
| Industrials | 32.4% | 27.4% |
| Information Technology | 12.3% | 29.9% |
| Utilities | 19.4% | 1.9% |
| Health Care | 0.0% | 12.4% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 0.0% | 4.3% |
| Other Sectors | 1.3% | 9.6% |
| Unclassified | 34.0% | 14.3% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (34% of ICLN, 14% of KOMP).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ICLN | -5.3% | +11.7% | +34.9% | +4.0% | -3.1% | +8.9% | 1.01% |
| KOMP | +3.5% | +18.5% | +29.5% | +17.6% | +3.3% | — | 1.47% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in ICLN vs KOMP →
Shared Holdings(12)
The top 10 shared positions account for 92% of the overlap, led by ENPH, SHLS and BE.
3.24% | 0.47% | 0.47% | |
1.00% | 0.39% | 0.39% | |
13.70% | 0.31% | 0.31% | |
3.27% | 0.27% | 0.27% | |
1.92% | 0.25% | 0.25% | |
7.14% | 0.24% | 0.24% | |
0.52% | 0.22% | 0.22% | |
0.73% | 0.19% | 0.19% | |
7.26% | 0.19% | 0.19% | |
0.53% | 0.17% | 0.17% | |
0.66% | 0.15% | 0.15% | |
1.88% | 0.08% | 0.08% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do ICLN and KOMP overlap?
ICLN and KOMP overlap by 2.9% of portfolio weight. They share 12 holdings (ICLN holds 123 positions and KOMP holds 501), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both ICLN and KOMP?
The two portfolios are 2.9% identical by weight. Owning both is genuine diversification: the funds hold almost none of the same securities.
What are the biggest shared holdings of ICLN and KOMP?
The largest positions held by both funds are ENPH, SHLS, BE, PLUG and SEDG. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 92% of the total overlap.
What does ICLN own that KOMP doesn't?
111 positions (57.5% of ICLN) are unique to ICLN, led by 600900, VWS and EQTL3. In the other direction, 489 positions (96.9% of KOMP) are unique to KOMP.