ICLN vs XMHQ: Holdings Overlap
ICLNiShares Global Clean Energy ETF
iShares · 123 holdings · $2.3B · as of 2026-04-30
XMHQInvesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF
Invesco · 80 holdings · $5.5B · as of 2026-04-30
How similar are ICLN and XMHQ?
iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN, by iShares) holds 123 positions; Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF (XMHQ, by Invesco) holds 80. They have 1 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 2.5% identical. In practical terms the pair is essentially distinct, holding almost none of the same securities.
- Overlap by Weight
- 2.5%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 1ICLN holds 123 · XMHQ holds 80
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- ICLN 7%·XMHQ 3%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in ICLN
122 of 123 positions (92.1% of the fund) are not held by XMHQ. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | ICLN | XMHQ |
|---|---|---|
| Industrials | 32.4% | 28.5% |
| Health Care | 0.0% | 19.7% |
| Utilities | 19.4% | 2.2% |
| Financials | 0.0% | 15.1% |
| Information Technology | 12.3% | 8.4% |
| Other Sectors | 1.3% | 26.0% |
| Unclassified | 34.0% | 0.0% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (34% of ICLN, 0% of XMHQ).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ICLN | -5.3% | +11.7% | +34.9% | +4.0% | -3.1% | +8.9% | 1.01% |
| XMHQ | +4.3% | +16.0% | +18.7% | +14.6% | +10.6% | +13.0% | 0.55% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in ICLN vs XMHQ →
Shared Holdings(1)
7.26% | 2.53% | 2.53% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do ICLN and XMHQ overlap?
ICLN and XMHQ overlap by 2.5% of portfolio weight. They share 1 holdings (ICLN holds 123 positions and XMHQ holds 80), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both ICLN and XMHQ?
The two portfolios are 2.5% identical by weight. Owning both is genuine diversification: the funds hold almost none of the same securities.
What are the biggest shared holdings of ICLN and XMHQ?
The largest positions held by both funds are NXT. Together the top 1 shared positions account for 100% of the total overlap.
What does ICLN own that XMHQ doesn't?
122 positions (92.1% of ICLN) are unique to ICLN, led by BE, FSLR and 600900. In the other direction, 79 positions (97.4% of XMHQ) are unique to XMHQ.