IEFA vs IXJ: Holdings Overlap
IEFAiShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF
iShares · 2632 holdings · $193.5B · as of 2026-04-30
IXJiShares Global Healthcare ETF
iShares · 123 holdings · $4.1B · as of 2026-03-31
Holdings snapshots are 30 days apart (IEFA: 2026-04-30, IXJ: 2026-03-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are IEFA and IXJ?
iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF (IEFA, by iShares) holds 2632 positions; iShares Global Healthcare ETF (IXJ, by iShares) holds 123. They have 58 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 8.6% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 8.6%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 58IEFA holds 2632 · IXJ holds 123
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- IEFA 9%·IXJ 29%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in IEFA
2574 of 2632 positions (90.6% of the fund) are not held by IXJ. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | IEFA | IXJ |
|---|---|---|
| Health Care | 8.3% | 98.9% |
| Financials | 20.5% | 0.0% |
| Industrials | 16.0% | 0.0% |
| Information Technology | 7.9% | 0.0% |
| Consumer Staples | 5.9% | 0.6% |
| Other Sectors | 23.8% | 0.1% |
| Unclassified | 17.0% | 0.0% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (17% of IEFA, 0% of IXJ).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IEFA | +4.2% | +14.8% | +24.5% | +17.9% | +9.3% | +9.8% | 3.25% |
| IXJ | +0.7% | +5.9% | +25.5% | +7.8% | +4.8% | +8.5% | 1.41% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in IEFA vs IXJ →
Shared Holdings(58)
The top 10 shared positions account for 66% of the overlap, led by AZN, ROP and NOVN.
1.16% | 4.02% | 1.16% | |
1.13% | 3.72% | 1.13% | |
1.11% | 3.87% | 1.11% | |
0.54% | 1.55% | 0.54% | |
0.42% | 1.49% | 0.42% | |
0.40% | 1.37% | 0.40% | |
0.25% | 0.90% | 0.25% | |
0.25% | 0.78% | 0.25% | |
0.21% | 0.78% | 0.21% | |
0.19% | 0.60% | 0.19% | |
0.17% | 0.60% | 0.17% | |
0.17% | 0.63% | 0.17% | |
0.17% | 0.60% | 0.17% | |
0.16% | 0.58% | 0.16% | |
0.15% | 0.48% | 0.15% | |
0.15% | 0.50% | 0.15% | |
0.14% | 0.47% | 0.14% | |
0.14% | 0.48% | 0.14% | |
0.13% | 0.46% | 0.13% | |
0.12% | 0.49% | 0.12% | |
0.12% | 0.45% | 0.12% | |
0.10% | 0.39% | 0.10% | |
0.08% | 0.28% | 0.08% | |
0.08% | 0.28% | 0.08% | |
0.07% | 0.26% | 0.07% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do IEFA and IXJ overlap?
IEFA and IXJ overlap by 8.6% of portfolio weight. They share 58 holdings (IEFA holds 2632 positions and IXJ holds 123), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both IEFA and IXJ?
The two portfolios are 8.6% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of IEFA and IXJ?
The largest positions held by both funds are AZN, ROP, NOVN, NOVOB and GSK. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 66% of the total overlap.
What does IEFA own that IXJ doesn't?
2574 positions (90.6% of IEFA) are unique to IEFA, led by ASML, HSBA and NESN. In the other direction, 65 positions (70.3% of IXJ) are unique to IXJ.