IEMG vs IGF: Holdings Overlap
IEMGiShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF
iShares · 2697 holdings · $156.6B · as of 2026-05-31
IGFiShares Global Infrastructure ETF
iShares · 88 holdings · $11.0B · as of 2026-03-31
Holdings snapshots are 61 days apart (IEMG: 2026-05-31, IGF: 2026-03-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are IEMG and IGF?
iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG, by iShares) holds 2697 positions; iShares Global Infrastructure ETF (IGF, by iShares) holds 88. They have 20 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 0.2% identical. In practical terms the pair is essentially distinct, holding almost none of the same securities.
- Overlap by Weight
- 0.2%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 20IEMG holds 2697 · IGF holds 88
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- IEMG 0%·IGF 3%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in IEMG
2677 of 2697 positions (99.5% of the fund) are not held by IGF. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | IEMG | IGF |
|---|---|---|
| Utilities | 0.8% | 39.3% |
| Information Technology | 36.2% | 0.0% |
| Energy | 2.3% | 20.7% |
| Industrials | 2.4% | 18.2% |
| Financials | 11.0% | 0.0% |
| Other Sectors | 16.4% | 0.1% |
| Unclassified | 30.7% | 21.4% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (31% of IEMG, 21% of IGF).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IEMG | +0.3% | +19.9% | +33.4% | +20.1% | +7.8% | +9.0% | 2.25% |
| IGF | -1.8% | +9.0% | +12.6% | +16.5% | +10.6% | +8.0% | 2.93% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in IEMG vs IGF →
Shared Holdings(20)
The top 10 shared positions account for 86% of the overlap, led by 836, 94C and HUP1.
0.04% | 0.14% | 0.04% | |
0.03% | 0.14% | 0.03% | |
0.03% | 0.08% | 0.03% | |
0.02% | 0.09% | 0.02% | |
0.02% | 0.08% | 0.02% | |
0.02% | 0.76% | 0.02% | |
0.01% | 0.07% | 0.01% | |
0.01% | 0.07% | 0.01% | |
0.01% | 0.56% | 0.01% | |
| HONG KONG DOLLAR | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.01% |
0.01% | 0.32% | 0.01% | |
0.01% | 0.44% | 0.01% | |
| Anhui Expressway Co Ltd | 0.01% | 0.28% | 0.01% |
| Yuexiu Transport Infrastructure Ltd | 0.00% | 0.12% | 0.00% |
| CANADIAN DOLLAR | 0.00% | 0.02% | 0.00% |
0.00% | 0.16% | 0.00% | |
| Euro | 0.00% | 0.01% | 0.00% |
| KOREAN WON | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| SINGAPORE DOLLARS | 0.00% | 0.02% | 0.00% |
| GREAT BRITISH POUND | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do IEMG and IGF overlap?
IEMG and IGF overlap by 0.2% of portfolio weight. They share 20 holdings (IEMG holds 2697 positions and IGF holds 88), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both IEMG and IGF?
The two portfolios are 0.2% identical by weight. Owning both is genuine diversification: the funds hold almost none of the same securities.
What are the biggest shared holdings of IEMG and IGF?
The largest positions held by both funds are 836, 94C, HUP1, 135 and 270. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 86% of the total overlap.
What does IEMG own that IGF doesn't?
2677 positions (99.5% of IEMG) are unique to IEMG, led by TSMWF, 005930 and 000660. In the other direction, 68 positions (96.4% of IGF) are unique to IGF.