IEMG vs MXI: Holdings Overlap
IEMGiShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF
iShares · 2697 holdings · $156.6B · as of 2026-05-31
MXIiShares Global Materials ETF
iShares · 101 holdings · $349M · as of 2026-03-31
Holdings snapshots are 61 days apart (IEMG: 2026-05-31, MXI: 2026-03-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are IEMG and MXI?
iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG, by iShares) holds 2697 positions; iShares Global Materials ETF (MXI, by iShares) holds 101. They have 10 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 0.5% identical. In practical terms the pair is essentially distinct, holding almost none of the same securities.
- Overlap by Weight
- 0.5%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 10IEMG holds 2697 · MXI holds 101
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- IEMG 1%·MXI 2%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in IEMG
2687 of 2697 positions (99.1% of the fund) are not held by MXI. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | IEMG | MXI |
|---|---|---|
| Materials | 2.9% | 99.5% |
| Information Technology | 36.2% | 0.0% |
| Financials | 11.0% | 0.0% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 6.0% | 0.0% |
| Communication Services | 4.6% | 0.0% |
| Other Sectors | 8.4% | 0.1% |
| Unclassified | 30.7% | 0.0% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (31% of IEMG, 0% of MXI).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IEMG | +0.3% | +19.9% | +33.4% | +20.1% | +7.8% | +9.0% | 2.25% |
| MXI | +6.2% | +18.1% | +32.9% | +13.0% | +7.2% | +10.9% | 1.62% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in IEMG vs MXI →
Shared Holdings(10)
The top 10 shared positions account for 100% of the overlap, led by GMEXICOB, CEMEXCPO and SCCO.
0.26% | 1.13% | 0.26% | |
0.14% | 0.58% | 0.14% | |
0.12% | 0.48% | 0.12% | |
| CANADIAN DOLLAR | 0.00% | 0.02% | 0.00% |
| Euro | 0.00% | 0.03% | 0.00% |
| CHILEAN PESO | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| MEXICAN NUEVO PESO | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| NEW TAIWAN DOLLAR | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| KOREAN WON | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| GREAT BRITISH POUND | 0.00% | 0.01% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do IEMG and MXI overlap?
IEMG and MXI overlap by 0.5% of portfolio weight. They share 10 holdings (IEMG holds 2697 positions and MXI holds 101), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both IEMG and MXI?
The two portfolios are 0.5% identical by weight. Owning both is genuine diversification: the funds hold almost none of the same securities.
What are the biggest shared holdings of IEMG and MXI?
The largest positions held by both funds are GMEXICOB, CEMEXCPO, SCCO, CANADIAN DOLLAR and Euro. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 100% of the total overlap.
What does IEMG own that MXI doesn't?
2687 positions (99.1% of IEMG) are unique to IEMG, led by TSMWF, 005930 and 000660. In the other direction, 91 positions (97.5% of MXI) are unique to MXI.