IFRA vs IWM: Holdings Overlap
IFRAiShares U.S. Infrastructure ETF
iShares · 162 holdings · $4.6B · as of 2026-03-31
iShares · 1941 holdings · $82.2B · as of 2026-03-31
How similar are IFRA and IWM?
iShares U.S. Infrastructure ETF (IFRA, by iShares) holds 162 positions; iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM, by iShares) holds 1941. They have 70 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 6.1% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 6.1%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 70IFRA holds 162 · IWM holds 1941
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- IFRA 7%·IWM 7%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in IFRA
92 of 162 positions (92.6% of the fund) are not held by IWM. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | IFRA | IWM |
|---|---|---|
| Utilities | 41.4% | 2.9% |
| Industrials | 35.2% | 17.9% |
| Health Care | 0.0% | 16.6% |
| Financials | 0.0% | 15.3% |
| Information Technology | 0.0% | 13.6% |
| Other Sectors | 22.4% | 27.9% |
| Unclassified | 0.9% | 5.5% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (1% of IFRA, 5% of IWM).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IFRA | -1.1% | +17.1% | +22.3% | +17.8% | +13.3% | — | 1.59% |
| IWM | +1.8% | +23.0% | +38.6% | +17.1% | +7.5% | +10.8% | 0.88% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in IFRA vs IWM →
Shared Holdings(70)
The top 10 shared positions account for 38% of the overlap, led by STRL, PRIM and FLR.
0.51% | 0.41% | 0.41% | |
0.32% | 0.26% | 0.26% | |
0.28% | 0.26% | 0.26% | |
0.30% | 0.25% | 0.25% | |
0.28% | 0.23% | 0.23% | |
0.28% | 0.23% | 0.23% | |
0.22% | 0.18% | 0.18% | |
0.18% | 0.20% | 0.18% | |
0.22% | 0.18% | 0.18% | |
0.17% | 0.20% | 0.17% | |
0.16% | 0.20% | 0.16% | |
0.19% | 0.16% | 0.16% | |
0.15% | 0.19% | 0.15% | |
0.18% | 0.15% | 0.15% | |
0.39% | 0.15% | 0.15% | |
0.18% | 0.15% | 0.15% | |
0.14% | 0.18% | 0.14% | |
0.14% | 0.18% | 0.14% | |
0.14% | 0.18% | 0.14% | |
0.15% | 0.12% | 0.12% | |
0.16% | 0.11% | 0.11% | |
0.11% | 0.14% | 0.11% | |
0.12% | 0.10% | 0.10% | |
0.11% | 0.10% | 0.10% | |
0.09% | 0.11% | 0.09% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do IFRA and IWM overlap?
IFRA and IWM overlap by 6.1% of portfolio weight. They share 70 holdings (IFRA holds 162 positions and IWM holds 1941), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both IFRA and IWM?
The two portfolios are 6.1% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of IFRA and IWM?
The largest positions held by both funds are STRL, PRIM, FLR, AGX and CMC. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 38% of the total overlap.
What does IFRA own that IWM doesn't?
92 positions (92.6% of IFRA) are unique to IFRA, led by CAT, NEE and UNP. In the other direction, 1871 positions (93.1% of IWM) are unique to IWM.