IFRA vs IWP: Holdings Overlap
IFRAiShares U.S. Infrastructure ETF
iShares · 162 holdings · $4.6B · as of 2026-03-31
IWPiShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF
iShares · 277 holdings · $20.5B · as of 2026-03-31
How similar are IFRA and IWP?
iShares U.S. Infrastructure ETF (IFRA, by iShares) holds 162 positions; iShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF (IWP, by iShares) holds 277. They have 15 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 7.2% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 7.2%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 15IFRA holds 162 · IWP holds 277
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- IFRA 14%·IWP 8%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in IFRA
147 of 162 positions (85.8% of the fund) are not held by IWP. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | IFRA | IWP |
|---|---|---|
| Utilities | 41.4% | 2.9% |
| Industrials | 35.2% | 24.4% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 0.3% | 21.2% |
| Information Technology | 0.0% | 15.6% |
| Health Care | 0.0% | 14.9% |
| Other Sectors | 22.0% | 20.9% |
| Unclassified | 0.9% | 0.0% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (1% of IFRA, 0% of IWP).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IFRA | -1.1% | +17.1% | +22.3% | +17.8% | +13.3% | — | 1.59% |
| IWP | +1.5% | +5.4% | +3.1% | +14.6% | +5.1% | +12.1% | 0.34% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in IFRA vs IWP →
Shared Holdings(15)
The top 10 shared positions account for 97% of the overlap, led by PWR, FIX and VST.
3.41% | 2.25% | 2.25% | |
2.01% | 1.73% | 1.73% | |
1.36% | 1.83% | 1.36% | |
0.80% | 1.08% | 0.80% | |
1.36% | 0.41% | 0.41% | |
0.81% | 0.15% | 0.15% | |
0.80% | 0.12% | 0.12% | |
1.02% | 0.09% | 0.09% | |
0.29% | 0.07% | 0.07% | |
0.46% | 0.06% | 0.06% | |
0.57% | 0.06% | 0.06% | |
0.33% | 0.05% | 0.05% | |
0.30% | 0.04% | 0.04% | |
0.30% | 0.02% | 0.02% | |
0.25% | 0.01% | 0.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do IFRA and IWP overlap?
IFRA and IWP overlap by 7.2% of portfolio weight. They share 15 holdings (IFRA holds 162 positions and IWP holds 277), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both IFRA and IWP?
The two portfolios are 7.2% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of IFRA and IWP?
The largest positions held by both funds are PWR, FIX, VST, NRG and EME. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 97% of the total overlap.
What does IFRA own that IWP doesn't?
147 positions (85.8% of IFRA) are unique to IFRA, led by CAT, NEE and UNP. In the other direction, 262 positions (91.9% of IWP) are unique to IWP.