IGF vs EWC: Holdings Overlap
IGFiShares Global Infrastructure ETF
iShares · 88 holdings · $11.0B · as of 2026-03-31
iShares · 84 holdings · $6.2B · as of 2026-05-31
Holdings snapshots are 61 days apart (IGF: 2026-03-31, EWC: 2026-05-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are IGF and EWC?
iShares Global Infrastructure ETF (IGF, by iShares) holds 88 positions; iShares MSCI Canada ETF (EWC, by iShares) holds 84. They have 5 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 7.4% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 7.4%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 5IGF holds 88 · EWC holds 84
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- IGF 8%·EWC 8%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in IGF
83 of 88 positions (91.9% of the fund) are not held by EWC. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Only in EWC
79 of 84 positions (92.3% of the fund) are not held by IGF. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | IGF | EWC |
|---|---|---|
| Utilities | 39.3% | 2.0% |
| Financials | 0.0% | 37.4% |
| Energy | 20.7% | 17.1% |
| Industrials | 18.2% | 5.5% |
| Materials | 0.0% | 15.5% |
| Other Sectors | 0.1% | 15.5% |
| Unclassified | 21.4% | 6.9% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (21% of IGF, 7% of EWC).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IGF | -1.8% | +9.0% | +12.6% | +16.5% | +10.6% | +8.0% | 2.93% |
| EWC | +5.0% | +14.2% | +31.3% | +22.9% | +12.6% | +11.6% | 1.22% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in IGF vs EWC →
Shared Holdings(5)
The top 5 shared positions account for 100% of the overlap, led by ENB, TRP and PBA.
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do IGF and EWC overlap?
IGF and EWC overlap by 7.4% of portfolio weight. They share 5 holdings (IGF holds 88 positions and EWC holds 84), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both IGF and EWC?
The two portfolios are 7.4% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of IGF and EWC?
The largest positions held by both funds are ENB, TRP, PBA, KEY and CANADIAN DOLLAR. Together the top 5 shared positions account for 100% of the total overlap.
What does IGF own that EWC doesn't?
83 positions (91.9% of IGF) are unique to IGF, led by NEE, AENA and TCL. In the other direction, 79 positions (92.3% of EWC) are unique to EWC.