IGF vs MLPX: Holdings Overlap
IGFiShares Global Infrastructure ETF
iShares · 88 holdings · $11.0B · as of 2026-03-31
MLPXGlobal X MLP and Energy Infrastructure ETF
Global X · 28 holdings · $3.6B · as of 2026-05-31
Holdings snapshots are 61 days apart (IGF: 2026-03-31, MLPX: 2026-05-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are IGF and MLPX?
iShares Global Infrastructure ETF (IGF, by iShares) holds 88 positions; Global X MLP and Energy Infrastructure ETF (MLPX, by Global X) holds 28. They have 11 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 20.7% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 20.7%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 11IGF holds 88 · MLPX holds 28
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- IGF 21%·MLPX 66%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in IGF
77 of 88 positions (79.0% of the fund) are not held by MLPX. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Only in MLPX
17 of 28 positions (33.8% of the fund) are not held by IGF.
- Energy Transfer LP4.48%
- Enterprise Products Partners LP4.43%
- MPLX LP PARTNERSHIP SHARES4.23%
- Plains All American Pipeline LP3.92%
- Western Midstream Partners LP3.88%
AROCArchrock Inc COM1.92%
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | IGF | MLPX |
|---|---|---|
| Energy | 20.7% | 99.5% |
| Utilities | 39.3% | 0.0% |
| Industrials | 18.2% | 0.0% |
| Real Estate | 0.1% | 0.0% |
| Communication Services | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Other Sectors | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Unclassified | 21.4% | 0.3% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (21% of IGF, 0% of MLPX).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IGF | -1.8% | +9.0% | +12.6% | +16.5% | +10.6% | +8.0% | 2.93% |
| MLPX | -3.0% | +23.1% | +25.2% | +25.3% | +22.4% | +11.8% | 3.17% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in IGF vs MLPX →
Shared Holdings(11)
The top 10 shared positions account for 99% of the overlap, led by ENB, WMB and LNG.
4.24% | 8.99% | 4.24% | |
3.14% | 8.54% | 3.14% | |
2.39% | 6.35% | 2.39% | |
2.37% | 7.42% | 2.37% | |
2.37% | 9.23% | 2.37% | |
2.23% | 6.57% | 2.23% | |
2.02% | 4.98% | 2.02% | |
0.90% | 4.55% | 0.90% | |
0.49% | 4.53% | 0.49% | |
0.27% | 2.33% | 0.27% | |
0.25% | 2.51% | 0.25% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do IGF and MLPX overlap?
IGF and MLPX overlap by 20.7% of portfolio weight. They share 11 holdings (IGF holds 88 positions and MLPX holds 28), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both IGF and MLPX?
The two portfolios are 20.7% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of IGF and MLPX?
The largest positions held by both funds are ENB, WMB, LNG, KMI and TRP. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 99% of the total overlap.
What does IGF own that MLPX doesn't?
77 positions (79.0% of IGF) are unique to IGF, led by NEE, AENA and TCL. In the other direction, 17 positions (33.8% of MLPX) are unique to MLPX.