IGF vs SCZ: Holdings Overlap
IGFiShares Global Infrastructure ETF
iShares · 88 holdings · $11.0B · as of 2026-03-31
SCZiShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF
iShares · 2044 holdings · $13.5B · as of 2026-04-30
Holdings snapshots are 30 days apart (IGF: 2026-03-31, SCZ: 2026-04-30). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are IGF and SCZ?
iShares Global Infrastructure ETF (IGF, by iShares) holds 88 positions; iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF (SCZ, by iShares) holds 2044. They have 20 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 1.0% identical. In practical terms the pair is essentially distinct, holding almost none of the same securities.
- Overlap by Weight
- 1.0%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 20IGF holds 88 · SCZ holds 2044
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- IGF 10%·SCZ 1%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in IGF
68 of 88 positions (89.8% of the fund) are not held by SCZ. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IGF | -1.8% | +9.0% | +12.6% | +16.5% | +10.6% | +8.0% | 2.93% |
| SCZ | +4.1% | +13.5% | +20.2% | +16.6% | +5.9% | +8.6% | 3.07% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in IGF vs SCZ →
Shared Holdings(20)
The top 10 shared positions account for 95% of the overlap, led by GTT, QUB and FHZN.
0.33% | 0.25% | 0.25% | |
2.18% | 0.16% | 0.16% | |
2.18% | 0.16% | 0.16% | |
1.04% | 0.10% | 0.10% | |
0.95% | 0.08% | 0.08% | |
0.89% | 0.06% | 0.06% | |
1.19% | 0.06% | 0.06% | |
0.53% | 0.04% | 0.04% | |
0.40% | 0.03% | 0.03% | |
| SIA Engineering Co Ltd | 0.21% | 0.02% | 0.02% |
| AUSTRALIAN DOLLAR | 0.02% | 0.14% | 0.02% |
| Euro | 0.01% | 0.06% | 0.01% |
| HONG KONG DOLLAR | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.01% |
| SINGAPORE DOLLARS | 0.02% | 0.01% | 0.01% |
| DANISH KRONER | 0.00% | 0.01% | 0.00% |
| JAPANESE YEN | 0.00% | 0.04% | 0.00% |
| SWISS FRANC | 0.00% | 0.03% | 0.00% |
| NEW ZEALAND DOLLAR | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| GREAT BRITISH POUND | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| NORWEGIAN KRONE | 0.00% | 0.02% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do IGF and SCZ overlap?
IGF and SCZ overlap by 1.0% of portfolio weight. They share 20 holdings (IGF holds 88 positions and SCZ holds 2044), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both IGF and SCZ?
The two portfolios are 1.0% identical by weight. Owning both is genuine diversification: the funds hold almost none of the same securities.
What are the biggest shared holdings of IGF and SCZ?
The largest positions held by both funds are GTT, QUB, FHZN, ALX and FRA. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 95% of the total overlap.
What does IGF own that SCZ doesn't?
68 positions (89.8% of IGF) are unique to IGF, led by NEE, AENA and TCL. In the other direction, 2024 positions (98.0% of SCZ) are unique to SCZ.