IGM vs DSI: Holdings Overlap
IGMiShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF
iShares · 288 holdings · $10.7B · as of 2026-03-31
DSIiShares ESG MSCI KLD 400 ETF
iShares · 400 holdings · $5.5B · as of 2026-04-30
Holdings snapshots are 30 days apart (IGM: 2026-03-31, DSI: 2026-04-30). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are IGM and DSI?
iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF (IGM, by iShares) holds 288 positions; iShares ESG MSCI KLD 400 ETF (DSI, by iShares) holds 400. They have 70 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 41.6% identical. In practical terms the pair is moderately overlapping; they share a meaningful core, but each fund adds distinct exposure.
- Overlap by Weight
- 41.6%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 70IGM holds 288 · DSI holds 400
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- IGM 55%·DSI 52%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in IGM
218 of 288 positions (45.3% of the fund) are not held by DSI. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | IGM | DSI |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 82.6% | 39.4% |
| Communication Services | 17.1% | 13.8% |
| Financials | 0.0% | 10.6% |
| Industrials | 0.0% | 9.0% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 0.0% | 7.9% |
| Other Sectors | 0.0% | 19.2% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts.
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IGM | +4.5% | +26.9% | +40.7% | +35.3% | +19.1% | +23.9% | 0.13% |
| DSI | +4.1% | +14.9% | +24.3% | +21.0% | +12.7% | +15.3% | 0.84% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in IGM vs DSI →
Shared Holdings(70)
The top 10 shared positions account for 77% of the overlap, led by NVDA, MSFT and GOOGL.
8.44% | 14.44% | 8.44% | |
8.23% | 8.58% | 8.23% | |
4.65% | 6.67% | 4.65% | |
3.73% | 5.54% | 3.73% | |
2.19% | 1.72% | 1.72% | |
1.37% | 1.27% | 1.27% | |
2.02% | 1.08% | 1.08% | |
1.76% | 0.96% | 0.96% | |
1.79% | 0.93% | 0.93% | |
1.65% | 0.83% | 0.83% | |
1.16% | 0.76% | 0.76% | |
1.49% | 0.64% | 0.64% | |
1.03% | 0.59% | 0.59% | |
1.15% | 0.49% | 0.49% | |
0.60% | 0.44% | 0.44% | |
0.56% | 0.44% | 0.44% | |
0.85% | 0.43% | 0.43% | |
0.57% | 0.42% | 0.42% | |
0.70% | 0.40% | 0.40% | |
0.80% | 0.33% | 0.33% | |
0.79% | 0.32% | 0.32% | |
0.66% | 0.31% | 0.31% | |
0.50% | 0.28% | 0.28% | |
0.72% | 0.27% | 0.27% | |
0.50% | 0.27% | 0.27% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do IGM and DSI overlap?
IGM and DSI overlap by 41.6% of portfolio weight. They share 70 holdings (IGM holds 288 positions and DSI holds 400), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both IGM and DSI?
The two portfolios are 41.6% identical by weight. Owning both is defensible: they share a meaningful core, but each fund adds exposure the other lacks.
What are the biggest shared holdings of IGM and DSI?
The largest positions held by both funds are NVDA, MSFT, GOOGL, GOOG and AMD. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 77% of the total overlap.
What does IGM own that DSI doesn't?
218 positions (45.3% of IGM) are unique to IGM, led by AAPL, AVGO and META. In the other direction, 330 positions (48.1% of DSI) are unique to DSI.