IGM vs IGV: Holdings Overlap
IGMiShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF
iShares · 288 holdings · $10.7B · as of 2026-03-31
IGViShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF
iShares · 112 holdings · $14.7B · as of 2026-03-31
How similar are IGM and IGV?
iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF (IGM, by iShares) holds 288 positions; iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF (IGV, by iShares) holds 112. They have 112 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 23.7% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 23.7%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 112IGM holds 288 · IGV holds 112
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- IGM 24%·IGV 100%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in IGM
176 of 288 positions (76.2% of the fund) are not held by IGV. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Only in IGV
Every position in IGV is also held by IGM, so it brings nothing the other fund doesn’t already own.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | IGM | IGV |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 82.6% | 90.6% |
| Communication Services | 17.1% | 8.2% |
| Financials | 0.0% | 0.2% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 0.0% | 0.2% |
| Industrials | 0.0% | 0.2% |
| Other Sectors | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts.
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IGM | +4.5% | +26.9% | +40.7% | +35.3% | +19.1% | +23.9% | 0.13% |
| IGV | +9.1% | -2.8% | -6.3% | +13.8% | +4.6% | +16.7% | 0.02% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in IGM vs IGV →
Shared Holdings(112)
The top 10 shared positions account for 74% of the overlap, led by MSFT, PLTR and ORCL.
8.23% | 8.36% | 8.23% | |
2.20% | 8.82% | 2.20% | |
1.65% | 8.24% | 1.65% | |
1.15% | 7.40% | 1.15% | |
0.85% | 5.48% | 0.85% | |
0.79% | 4.75% | 0.79% | |
0.72% | 4.38% | 0.72% | |
0.71% | 4.56% | 0.71% | |
0.66% | 4.27% | 0.66% | |
0.65% | 4.21% | 0.65% | |
0.50% | 3.25% | 0.50% | |
0.50% | 3.24% | 0.50% | |
0.34% | 2.21% | 0.34% | |
0.33% | 2.17% | 0.33% | |
0.30% | 1.97% | 0.30% | |
0.26% | 1.67% | 0.26% | |
0.26% | 1.66% | 0.26% | |
0.25% | 1.61% | 0.25% | |
0.23% | 1.47% | 0.23% | |
0.18% | 1.18% | 0.18% | |
0.17% | 1.08% | 0.17% | |
0.14% | 0.91% | 0.14% | |
0.11% | 0.73% | 0.11% | |
0.10% | 0.66% | 0.10% | |
0.10% | 0.63% | 0.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do IGM and IGV overlap?
IGM and IGV overlap by 23.7% of portfolio weight. They share 112 holdings (IGM holds 288 positions and IGV holds 112), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both IGM and IGV?
The two portfolios are 23.7% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of IGM and IGV?
The largest positions held by both funds are MSFT, PLTR, ORCL, CRM and PANW. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 74% of the total overlap.
What does IGM own that IGV doesn't?
176 positions (76.2% of IGM) are unique to IGM, led by AAPL, NVDA and AVGO. In the other direction, 0 positions (0.0% of IGV) are unique to IGV.