IGM vs JQUA: Holdings Overlap
IGMiShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF
iShares · 288 holdings · $10.7B · as of 2026-03-31
JQUAJPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF
JPMorgan · 289 holdings · $8.2B · as of 2026-04-30
Holdings snapshots are 30 days apart (IGM: 2026-03-31, JQUA: 2026-04-30). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are IGM and JQUA?
iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF (IGM, by iShares) holds 288 positions; JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF (JQUA, by JPMorgan) holds 289. They have 92 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 36.4% identical. In practical terms the pair is moderately overlapping; they share a meaningful core, but each fund adds distinct exposure.
- Overlap by Weight
- 36.4%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 92IGM holds 288 · JQUA holds 289
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- IGM 77%·JQUA 43%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in IGM
196 of 288 positions (23.4% of the fund) are not held by JQUA. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | IGM | JQUA |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 82.6% | 37.8% |
| Communication Services | 17.1% | 6.8% |
| Financials | 0.0% | 12.4% |
| Industrials | 0.0% | 10.0% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 0.0% | 9.6% |
| Other Sectors | 0.0% | 23.3% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts.
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IGM | +4.5% | +26.9% | +40.7% | +35.3% | +19.1% | +23.9% | 0.13% |
| JQUA | +3.6% | +18.6% | +24.4% | +19.8% | +13.4% | — | 1.05% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in IGM vs JQUA →
Shared Holdings(92)
The top 10 shared positions account for 48% of the overlap, led by GOOGL, AVGO and NVDA.
4.65% | 2.35% | 2.35% | |
8.16% | 2.11% | 2.11% | |
8.44% | 2.05% | 2.05% | |
8.76% | 2.01% | 2.01% | |
4.17% | 1.71% | 1.71% | |
8.23% | 1.66% | 1.66% | |
2.19% | 1.64% | 1.64% | |
2.51% | 1.61% | 1.61% | |
2.02% | 1.21% | 1.21% | |
1.76% | 1.15% | 1.15% | |
1.79% | 1.11% | 1.11% | |
1.27% | 0.89% | 0.89% | |
2.20% | 0.86% | 0.86% | |
1.16% | 0.85% | 0.85% | |
1.03% | 0.79% | 0.79% | |
0.91% | 0.79% | 0.79% | |
1.02% | 0.71% | 0.71% | |
0.62% | 0.83% | 0.62% | |
0.85% | 0.61% | 0.61% | |
0.60% | 0.75% | 0.60% | |
1.15% | 0.55% | 0.55% | |
0.57% | 0.53% | 0.53% | |
0.71% | 0.47% | 0.47% | |
0.66% | 0.45% | 0.45% | |
0.50% | 0.43% | 0.43% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do IGM and JQUA overlap?
IGM and JQUA overlap by 36.4% of portfolio weight. They share 92 holdings (IGM holds 288 positions and JQUA holds 289), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both IGM and JQUA?
The two portfolios are 36.4% identical by weight. Owning both is defensible: they share a meaningful core, but each fund adds exposure the other lacks.
What are the biggest shared holdings of IGM and JQUA?
The largest positions held by both funds are GOOGL, AVGO, NVDA, AAPL and META. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 48% of the total overlap.
What does IGM own that JQUA doesn't?
196 positions (23.4% of IGM) are unique to IGM, led by GOOG, NFLX and ORCL. In the other direction, 197 positions (57.0% of JQUA) are unique to JQUA.