IGM vs KOMP: Holdings Overlap
IGMiShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF
iShares · 288 holdings · $10.7B · as of 2026-03-31
KOMPState Street® SPDR® S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF
State Street (SPDR) · 501 holdings · $2.6B · as of 2026-08-06
Holdings snapshots are 128 days apart (IGM: 2026-03-31, KOMP: 2026-08-06). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are IGM and KOMP?
iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF (IGM, by iShares) holds 288 positions; State Street® SPDR® S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF (KOMP, by State Street (SPDR)) holds 501. They have 111 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 10.5% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 10.5%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 111IGM holds 288 · KOMP holds 501
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- IGM 64%·KOMP 27%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in IGM
177 of 288 positions (36.2% of the fund) are not held by KOMP. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Only in KOMP
390 of 501 positions (72.7% of the fund) are not held by IGM. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | IGM | KOMP |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 82.6% | 29.9% |
| Industrials | 0.0% | 27.4% |
| Communication Services | 17.1% | 3.6% |
| Health Care | 0.0% | 12.4% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 0.0% | 4.3% |
| Other Sectors | 0.0% | 7.9% |
| Unclassified | 0.1% | 14.3% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (0% of IGM, 14% of KOMP).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IGM | +4.5% | +26.9% | +40.7% | +35.3% | +19.1% | +23.9% | 0.13% |
| KOMP | +3.5% | +18.5% | +29.5% | +17.6% | +3.3% | — | 1.47% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in IGM vs KOMP →
Shared Holdings(111)
The top 10 shared positions account for 39% of the overlap, led by NVDA, META and KLAC.
 NVDANVIDIA Corp. COM | 8.44% | 0.77% | 0.77% |
|---|---|---|---|
 METAMeta Platforms, Inc., Class A | 4.17% | 0.63% | 0.63% |
 KLACKLA Corp. COM NEW | 1.27% | 0.55% | 0.55% |
 MUMicron Technology Inc. COM | 2.51% | 0.40% | 0.40% |
 CSCOCisco Systems, Inc. COM | 2.02% | 0.37% | 0.37% |
 ADSKAutodesk Inc COM | 0.33% | 0.42% | 0.33% |
 COHRCoherent Corp COM | 0.29% | 0.29% | 0.29% |
 NOWServicenow Inc COM | 0.72% | 0.27% | 0.27% |
 AMATApplied Materials Inc. COM | 1.79% | 0.24% | 0.24% |
 GOOGAlphabet Inc. CAP STK CL C | 3.73% | 0.22% | 0.22% |
 PANWPalo Alto Networks Inc COM | 0.85% | 0.21% | 0.21% |
 MSFTMicrosoft Corp. COM | 8.23% | 0.21% | 0.21% |
 QCOMQUALCOMM Inc. COM | 0.91% | 0.21% | 0.21% |
 CRWDCrowdstrike Holdings, Inc., Class A | 0.65% | 0.20% | 0.20% |
 TELTE Connectivity PLC ORD SHS | 0.40% | 0.19% | 0.19% |
 APHAmphenol Corporation CL A | 1.02% | 0.19% | 0.19% |
 TDYTeledyne Technologies Inc COM | 0.19% | 0.65% | 0.19% |
 TERTeradyne Inc. COM | 0.31% | 0.19% | 0.19% |
 FTNTFortinet Inc COM | 0.34% | 0.18% | 0.18% |
 SNPSSynopsys Inc COM | 0.50% | 0.18% | 0.18% |
 DDOGDatadog, Inc., Class A | 0.26% | 0.18% | 0.18% |
 ONON Semiconductor Corp. COM | 0.16% | 0.46% | 0.16% |
 ADIAnalog Devices Inc. COM | 1.03% | 0.15% | 0.15% |
 ZMZoom Communications, Inc., Class A | 0.14% | 0.18% | 0.14% |
 FSLRFirst Solar Inc COM | 0.14% | 0.24% | 0.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do IGM and KOMP overlap?
IGM and KOMP overlap by 10.5% of portfolio weight. They share 111 holdings (IGM holds 288 positions and KOMP holds 501), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both IGM and KOMP?
The two portfolios are 10.5% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of IGM and KOMP?
The largest positions held by both funds are NVDA, META, KLAC, MU and CSCO. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 39% of the total overlap.
What does IGM own that KOMP doesn't?
177 positions (36.2% of IGM) are unique to IGM, led by GOOGL, NFLX and PLTR. In the other direction, 390 positions (72.7% of KOMP) are unique to KOMP.