IGM vs MINT: Holdings Overlap
IGMiShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF
iShares · 288 holdings · $10.7B · as of 2026-03-31
MINTPIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active Exchange-Traded Fund
PIMCO · 1021 holdings · $17.1B · as of 2026-03-31
How similar are IGM and MINT?
iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF (IGM, by iShares) holds 288 positions; PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active Exchange-Traded Fund (MINT, by PIMCO) holds 1021. They have 0 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 0.0% identical. In practical terms the pair is essentially distinct, holding almost none of the same securities.
- Overlap by Weight
- 0.0%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 0IGM holds 288 · MINT holds 1021
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- IGM 0%·MINT 0%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in IGM
288 of 288 positions (99.9% of the fund) are not held by MINT. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Only in MINT
1021 of 1021 positions (99.2% of the fund) are not held by IGM. Showing the top 30 by weight.
- U.S. Treasury Notes3.39%
- FANNIE MAE FNR 2025 18 FM1.29%
- FREDDIE MAC FHR 5513 MF1.14%
- Sumisho Air Lease Corp.0.88%
- AerCap Ireland Capital DAC0.78%
- International Bank for Reconstruction & Development0.72%
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IGM | +4.5% | +26.9% | +40.7% | +35.3% | +19.1% | +23.9% | 0.13% |
| MINT | +0.4% | +2.6% | +4.5% | +5.3% | +3.6% | +2.8% | 4.18% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in IGM vs MINT →
Shared Holdings(0)
These two funds have no holdings in common.
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do IGM and MINT overlap?
IGM and MINT overlap by 0.0% of portfolio weight. They share 0 holdings (IGM holds 288 positions and MINT holds 1021), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both IGM and MINT?
The two portfolios are 0.0% identical by weight. Owning both is genuine diversification: the funds hold almost none of the same securities.
What does IGM own that MINT doesn't?
288 positions (99.9% of IGM) are unique to IGM, led by AAPL, NVDA and MSFT. In the other direction, 1021 positions (99.2% of MINT) are unique to MINT.