IGM vs ONEQ: Holdings Overlap
IGMiShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF
iShares · 288 holdings · $10.7B · as of 2026-03-31
ONEQFidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF
Fidelity · 1022 holdings · $10.8B · as of 2026-05-31
Holdings snapshots are 61 days apart (IGM: 2026-03-31, ONEQ: 2026-05-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are IGM and ONEQ?
iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF (IGM, by iShares) holds 288 positions; Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF (ONEQ, by Fidelity) holds 1022. They have 176 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 61.2% identical. In practical terms the pair is heavily overlapping, with largely the same stocks driving both funds.
- Overlap by Weight
- 61.2%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 176IGM holds 288 · ONEQ holds 1022
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- IGM 84%·ONEQ 66%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in IGM
112 of 288 positions (15.5% of the fund) are not held by ONEQ. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | IGM | ONEQ |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 82.6% | 53.0% |
| Communication Services | 17.1% | 15.2% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 0.0% | 12.5% |
| Consumer Staples | 0.0% | 4.4% |
| Health Care | 0.0% | 4.4% |
| Other Sectors | 0.1% | 8.4% |
| Unclassified | 0.1% | 1.6% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (0% of IGM, 2% of ONEQ).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IGM | +4.5% | +26.9% | +40.7% | +35.3% | +19.1% | +23.9% | 0.13% |
| ONEQ | +3.3% | +15.4% | +26.6% | +25.1% | +13.6% | +18.8% | 0.51% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in IGM vs ONEQ →
Shared Holdings(176)
The top 10 shared positions account for 75% of the overlap, led by AAPL, NVDA and MSFT.
 AAPLApple Inc. COM | 8.76% | 9.98% | 8.76% |
|---|---|---|---|
 NVDANVIDIA Corp. COM | 8.44% | 11.18% | 8.44% |
 MSFTMicrosoft Corp. COM | 8.23% | 7.29% | 7.29% |
 GOOGLAlphabet Inc. CAP STK CL A | 4.65% | 4.83% | 4.65% |
 AVGOBroadcom Inc COM | 8.16% | 4.61% | 4.61% |
 GOOGAlphabet Inc. CAP STK CL C | 3.73% | 4.46% | 3.73% |
 METAMeta Platforms, Inc., Class A | 4.17% | 3.01% | 3.01% |
 MUMicron Technology Inc. COM | 2.51% | 2.37% | 2.37% |
 AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc. COM | 2.19% | 1.83% | 1.83% |
 INTCIntel Corporation COM | 1.37% | 1.24% | 1.24% |
 CSCOCisco Systems, Inc. COM | 2.02% | 1.03% | 1.03% |
 LRCXLam Research Corporation COM NEW | 1.76% | 0.86% | 0.86% |
 NFLXNetflix, Inc. COM | 2.68% | 0.79% | 0.79% |
 PLTRPalantir Technologies, Inc., Class A | 2.20% | 0.78% | 0.78% |
 AMATApplied Materials Inc. COM | 1.79% | 0.77% | 0.77% |
 TXNTexas Instruments Inc. COM | 1.16% | 0.60% | 0.60% |
 QCOMQUALCOMM Inc. COM | 0.91% | 0.58% | 0.58% |
 KLACKLA Corp. COM NEW | 1.27% | 0.55% | 0.55% |
 SNDKSandisk Corporation COM | 0.62% | 0.54% | 0.54% |
 PANWPalo Alto Networks Inc COM | 0.85% | 0.50% | 0.50% |
 ADIAnalog Devices Inc. COM | 1.03% | 0.44% | 0.44% |
 STXSeagate Technology Holdings PLC ORD SHS | 0.56% | 0.42% | 0.42% |
 APPAppLovin Corp., Class A | 0.71% | 0.41% | 0.41% |
 CRWDCrowdstrike Holdings, Inc., Class A | 0.65% | 0.40% | 0.40% |
 WDCWestern Digital Corp. COM | 0.60% | 0.39% | 0.39% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do IGM and ONEQ overlap?
IGM and ONEQ overlap by 61.2% of portfolio weight. They share 176 holdings (IGM holds 288 positions and ONEQ holds 1022), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both IGM and ONEQ?
The two portfolios are 61.2% identical by weight. Owning both mostly doubles down on the shared core rather than diversifying: the same large positions drive both funds.
What are the biggest shared holdings of IGM and ONEQ?
The largest positions held by both funds are AAPL, NVDA, MSFT, GOOGL and AVGO. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 75% of the total overlap.
What does IGM own that ONEQ doesn't?
112 positions (15.5% of IGM) are unique to IGM, led by ORCL, IBM and CRM. In the other direction, 846 positions (33.4% of ONEQ) are unique to ONEQ.