IGM vs QQQ: Holdings Overlap
IGMiShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF
iShares · 288 holdings · $10.7B · as of 2026-03-31
QQQInvesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Invesco · 101 holdings · $479.2B · as of 2026-03-31
How similar are IGM and QQQ?
iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF (IGM, by iShares) holds 288 positions; Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ, by Invesco) holds 101. They have 44 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 62.2% identical. In practical terms the pair is heavily overlapping, with largely the same stocks driving both funds.
- Overlap by Weight
- 62.2%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 44IGM holds 288 · QQQ holds 101
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- IGM 78%·QQQ 62%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in IGM
244 of 288 positions (22.1% of the fund) are not held by QQQ. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | IGM | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 82.6% | 49.7% |
| Communication Services | 17.1% | 16.0% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 0.0% | 12.6% |
| Consumer Staples | 0.0% | 8.5% |
| Health Care | 0.0% | 5.1% |
| Other Sectors | 0.1% | 8.0% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts.
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IGM | +4.5% | +26.9% | +40.7% | +35.3% | +19.1% | +23.9% | 0.13% |
| QQQ | +1.9% | +18.0% | +27.6% | +25.2% | +15.2% | +20.8% | 0.42% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in IGM vs QQQ →
Shared Holdings(44)
The top 10 shared positions account for 66% of the overlap, led by NVDA, AAPL and MSFT.
 NVDANVIDIA Corp. | 8.44% | 8.68% | 8.44% |
|---|---|---|---|
 AAPLApple, Inc. | 8.76% | 7.63% | 7.63% |
 MSFTMicrosoft Corp. | 8.23% | 5.63% | 5.63% |
 METAMeta Platforms, Inc., Class A | 4.17% | 3.46% | 3.46% |
 GOOGLAlphabet, Inc., Class A | 4.65% | 3.43% | 3.43% |
 GOOGAlphabet, Inc., Class C | 3.73% | 3.20% | 3.20% |
 AVGOBroadcom, Inc. | 8.16% | 3.01% | 3.01% |
 NFLXNetflix, Inc. | 2.68% | 2.30% | 2.30% |
 MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 2.51% | 2.15% | 2.15% |
 PLTRPalantir Technologies, Inc., Class A | 2.20% | 1.90% | 1.90% |
 AMDAdvanced Micro Devices, Inc. | 2.19% | 1.88% | 1.88% |
 CSCOCisco Systems, Inc. | 2.02% | 1.73% | 1.73% |
 AMATApplied Materials, Inc. | 1.79% | 1.53% | 1.53% |
 LRCXLam Research Corp. | 1.76% | 1.51% | 1.51% |
 INTCIntel Corp. | 1.37% | 1.25% | 1.25% |
 KLACKLA Corp. | 1.27% | 1.09% | 1.09% |
 TXNTexas Instruments, Inc. | 1.16% | 1.00% | 1.00% |
 ADIAnalog Devices, Inc. | 1.03% | 0.88% | 0.88% |
 SHOPShopify, Inc., Class A | 0.96% | 0.82% | 0.82% |
 QCOMQUALCOMM, Inc. | 0.91% | 0.78% | 0.78% |
 PANWPalo Alto Networks, Inc. | 0.85% | 0.74% | 0.74% |
 APPAppLovin Corp., Class A | 0.71% | 0.69% | 0.69% |
 INTUIntuit, Inc. | 0.79% | 0.68% | 0.68% |
 ADBEAdobe, Inc. | 0.66% | 0.56% | 0.56% |
 CRWDCrowdstrike Holdings, Inc., Class A | 0.65% | 0.56% | 0.56% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do IGM and QQQ overlap?
IGM and QQQ overlap by 62.2% of portfolio weight. They share 44 holdings (IGM holds 288 positions and QQQ holds 101), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both IGM and QQQ?
The two portfolios are 62.2% identical by weight. Owning both mostly doubles down on the shared core rather than diversifying: the same large positions drive both funds.
What are the biggest shared holdings of IGM and QQQ?
The largest positions held by both funds are NVDA, AAPL, MSFT, META and GOOGL. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 66% of the total overlap.
What does IGM own that QQQ doesn't?
244 positions (22.1% of IGM) are unique to IGM, led by ORCL, IBM and CRM. In the other direction, 57 positions (37.4% of QQQ) are unique to QQQ.