IGM vs SPHQ: Holdings Overlap
IGMiShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF
iShares · 288 holdings · $10.7B · as of 2026-03-31
SPHQInvesco S&P 500 Quality ETF
Invesco · 99 holdings · $20.0B · as of 2026-04-30
Holdings snapshots are 30 days apart (IGM: 2026-03-31, SPHQ: 2026-04-30). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are IGM and SPHQ?
iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF (IGM, by iShares) holds 288 positions; Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ, by Invesco) holds 99. They have 20 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 16.8% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 16.8%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 20IGM holds 288 · SPHQ holds 99
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- IGM 21%·SPHQ 30%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in IGM
268 of 288 positions (78.8% of the fund) are not held by SPHQ. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | IGM | SPHQ |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 82.6% | 27.6% |
| Industrials | 0.0% | 24.5% |
| Communication Services | 17.1% | 2.0% |
| Consumer Staples | 0.0% | 15.3% |
| Financials | 0.0% | 13.4% |
| Other Sectors | 0.0% | 17.0% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts.
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IGM | +4.5% | +26.9% | +40.7% | +35.3% | +19.1% | +23.9% | 0.13% |
| SPHQ | -0.8% | +15.3% | +21.9% | +19.9% | +12.7% | +14.6% | 1.09% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in IGM vs SPHQ →
Shared Holdings(20)
The top 10 shared positions account for 90% of the overlap, led by AAPL, CSCO and AMAT.
8.76% | 4.50% | 4.50% | |
2.02% | 3.54% | 2.02% | |
1.79% | 2.79% | 1.79% | |
1.76% | 4.09% | 1.76% | |
1.27% | 3.27% | 1.27% | |
0.91% | 2.03% | 0.91% | |
0.80% | 1.04% | 0.80% | |
0.71% | 1.56% | 0.71% | |
0.66% | 1.44% | 0.66% | |
0.60% | 2.15% | 0.60% | |
0.47% | 0.74% | 0.47% | |
0.34% | 0.85% | 0.34% | |
0.30% | 0.45% | 0.30% | |
0.13% | 0.32% | 0.13% | |
0.11% | 0.16% | 0.11% | |
0.10% | 0.18% | 0.10% | |
0.10% | 0.15% | 0.10% | |
0.07% | 0.13% | 0.07% | |
0.07% | 0.10% | 0.07% | |
0.05% | 0.10% | 0.05% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do IGM and SPHQ overlap?
IGM and SPHQ overlap by 16.8% of portfolio weight. They share 20 holdings (IGM holds 288 positions and SPHQ holds 99), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both IGM and SPHQ?
The two portfolios are 16.8% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of IGM and SPHQ?
The largest positions held by both funds are AAPL, CSCO, AMAT, LRCX and KLAC. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 90% of the total overlap.
What does IGM own that SPHQ doesn't?
268 positions (78.8% of IGM) are unique to IGM, led by NVDA, MSFT and AVGO. In the other direction, 79 positions (70.2% of SPHQ) are unique to SPHQ.