IGM vs TCAF: Holdings Overlap
IGMiShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF
iShares · 288 holdings · $10.7B · as of 2026-03-31
TCAFT. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Equity ETF
T. Rowe Price · 92 holdings · $8.3B · as of 2026-03-31
How similar are IGM and TCAF?
iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF (IGM, by iShares) holds 288 positions; T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Equity ETF (TCAF, by T. Rowe Price) holds 92. They have 18 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 34.1% identical. In practical terms the pair is moderately overlapping; they share a meaningful core, but each fund adds distinct exposure.
- Overlap by Weight
- 34.1%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 18IGM holds 288 · TCAF holds 92
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- IGM 54%·TCAF 38%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in IGM
270 of 288 positions (45.6% of the fund) are not held by TCAF. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | IGM | TCAF |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 82.6% | 30.5% |
| Health Care | 0.0% | 17.6% |
| Communication Services | 17.1% | 8.2% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 0.0% | 12.1% |
| Utilities | 0.0% | 10.2% |
| Other Sectors | 0.1% | 17.9% |
| Unclassified | 0.1% | 3.3% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (0% of IGM, 3% of TCAF).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IGM | +4.5% | +26.9% | +40.7% | +35.3% | +19.1% | +23.9% | 0.13% |
| TCAF | +3.1% | +12.1% | +18.5% | +18.6% | — | — | 0.45% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in IGM vs TCAF →
Shared Holdings(18)
The top 10 shared positions account for 97% of the overlap, led by MSFT, AAPL and NVDA.
 MSFTMicrosoft Corp. COM | 8.23% | 7.12% | 7.12% |
|---|---|---|---|
 AAPLApple Inc. COM | 8.76% | 5.95% | 5.95% |
 NVDANVIDIA Corp. COM | 8.44% | 5.34% | 5.34% |
 GOOGLAlphabet Inc. CAP STK CL A | 4.65% | 4.05% | 4.05% |
 METAMeta Platforms, Inc., Class A | 4.17% | 3.93% | 3.93% |
 AVGOBroadcom Inc COM | 8.16% | 3.08% | 3.08% |
 AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc. COM | 2.19% | 2.22% | 2.19% |
 MUMicron Technology Inc. COM | 2.51% | 0.70% | 0.70% |
 KLACKLA Corp. COM NEW | 1.27% | 0.56% | 0.56% |
 ANETArista Networks Inc COM SHS | 0.84% | 0.28% | 0.28% |
 CIENCiena Corporation COM NEW | 0.36% | 0.20% | 0.20% |
 CDNSCadence Design Systems, Inc. COM | 0.50% | 0.19% | 0.19% |
 WDAYWorkday, Inc., Class A | 0.18% | 0.64% | 0.18% |
 PTCPTC Inc COM | 0.11% | 2.20% | 0.11% |
 GOOGAlphabet Inc. CAP STK CL C | 3.73% | 0.09% | 0.09% |
 TYLTyler Technologies Inc. COM | 0.10% | 0.04% | 0.04% |
 BSYBentley Systems Incorporated COM CL B | 0.03% | 0.59% | 0.03% |
 AURAurora Innovation Inc CLASS A COM | 0.03% | 0.48% | 0.03% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do IGM and TCAF overlap?
IGM and TCAF overlap by 34.1% of portfolio weight. They share 18 holdings (IGM holds 288 positions and TCAF holds 92), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both IGM and TCAF?
The two portfolios are 34.1% identical by weight. Owning both is defensible: they share a meaningful core, but each fund adds exposure the other lacks.
What are the biggest shared holdings of IGM and TCAF?
The largest positions held by both funds are MSFT, AAPL, NVDA, GOOGL and META. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 97% of the total overlap.
What does IGM own that TCAF doesn't?
270 positions (45.6% of IGM) are unique to IGM, led by NFLX, PLTR and CSCO. In the other direction, 74 positions (62.2% of TCAF) are unique to TCAF.