IGV vs AIQ: Holdings Overlap
IGViShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF
iShares · 112 holdings · $14.7B · as of 2026-03-31
AIQGlobal X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF
Global X · 84 holdings · $10.3B · as of 2026-05-31
Holdings snapshots are 61 days apart (IGV: 2026-03-31, AIQ: 2026-05-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are IGV and AIQ?
iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF (IGV, by iShares) holds 112 positions; Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF (AIQ, by Global X) holds 84. They have 21 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 15.7% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 15.7%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 21IGV holds 112 · AIQ holds 84
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- IGV 58%·AIQ 16%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in IGV
91 of 112 positions (42.3% of the fund) are not held by AIQ. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | IGV | AIQ |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 90.6% | 73.2% |
| Communication Services | 8.2% | 11.0% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 0.2% | 7.0% |
| Industrials | 0.2% | 4.4% |
| Financials | 0.2% | 0.0% |
| Other Sectors | 0.0% | 0.2% |
| Unclassified | 0.5% | 4.1% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (0% of IGV, 4% of AIQ).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IGV | +9.1% | -2.8% | -6.3% | +13.8% | +4.6% | +16.7% | 0.02% |
| AIQ | +2.0% | +24.6% | +41.8% | +30.6% | +15.7% | — | 0.07% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in IGV vs AIQ →
Shared Holdings(21)
The top 10 shared positions account for 89% of the overlap, led by ORCL, MSFT and PLTR.
8.24% | 2.99% | 2.99% | |
8.36% | 2.36% | 2.36% | |
8.82% | 2.23% | 2.23% | |
4.56% | 1.38% | 1.38% | |
7.40% | 1.31% | 1.31% | |
4.38% | 0.94% | 0.94% | |
4.27% | 0.78% | 0.78% | |
3.24% | 0.74% | 0.74% | |
3.25% | 0.66% | 0.66% | |
1.66% | 0.59% | 0.59% | |
0.47% | 0.24% | 0.24% | |
1.18% | 0.23% | 0.23% | |
0.19% | 0.53% | 0.19% | |
0.20% | 0.18% | 0.18% | |
0.22% | 0.18% | 0.18% | |
0.17% | 0.17% | 0.17% | |
0.61% | 0.16% | 0.16% | |
0.15% | 0.14% | 0.14% | |
0.11% | 0.19% | 0.11% | |
0.10% | 0.27% | 0.10% | |
0.04% | 0.20% | 0.04% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do IGV and AIQ overlap?
IGV and AIQ overlap by 15.7% of portfolio weight. They share 21 holdings (IGV holds 112 positions and AIQ holds 84), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both IGV and AIQ?
The two portfolios are 15.7% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of IGV and AIQ?
The largest positions held by both funds are ORCL, MSFT, PLTR, APP and CRM. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 89% of the total overlap.
What does IGV own that AIQ doesn't?
91 positions (42.3% of IGV) are unique to IGV, led by PANW, INTU and CRWD. In the other direction, 63 positions (83.4% of AIQ) are unique to AIQ.