IGV vs IWP: Holdings Overlap
IGViShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF
iShares · 112 holdings · $14.7B · as of 2026-03-31
IWPiShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF
iShares · 277 holdings · $20.5B · as of 2026-03-31
How similar are IGV and IWP?
iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF (IGV, by iShares) holds 112 positions; iShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF (IWP, by iShares) holds 277. They have 28 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 7.2% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 7.2%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 28IGV holds 112 · IWP holds 277
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- IGV 13%·IWP 7%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in IGV
84 of 112 positions (87.4% of the fund) are not held by IWP. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Only in IWP
249 of 277 positions (92.7% of the fund) are not held by IGV. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | IGV | IWP |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 90.6% | 15.6% |
| Industrials | 0.2% | 24.4% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 0.2% | 21.2% |
| Health Care | 0.0% | 14.9% |
| Financials | 0.2% | 8.5% |
| Other Sectors | 8.2% | 15.3% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts.
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IGV | +9.1% | -2.8% | -6.3% | +13.8% | +4.6% | +16.7% | 0.02% |
| IWP | +1.5% | +5.4% | +3.1% | +14.6% | +5.1% | +12.1% | 0.34% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in IGV vs IWP →
Shared Holdings(28)
The top 10 shared positions account for 74% of the overlap, led by DDOG, FICO and ZS.
 DDOGDatadog, Inc., Class A | 1.66% | 1.33% | 1.33% |
|---|---|---|---|
 FICOFair Isaac Corp. | 1.08% | 0.73% | 0.73% |
 ZSZscaler, Inc. | 0.61% | 0.50% | 0.50% |
 GWREGuidewire Software, Inc. | 0.54% | 0.46% | 0.46% |
 HUBSHubSpot, Inc. | 0.55% | 0.45% | 0.45% |
 TYLTyler Technologies, Inc. | 0.63% | 0.44% | 0.44% |
 TTWOTake-Two Interactive Software, Inc. | 1.47% | 0.44% | 0.44% |
 DTDynatrace, Inc. | 0.47% | 0.39% | 0.39% |
 IOTSamsara, Inc., Class A | 0.49% | 0.37% | 0.37% |
 MANHManhattan Associates, Inc. | 0.34% | 0.28% | 0.28% |
 PCORProcore Technologies, Inc. | 0.29% | 0.26% | 0.26% |
 DOCUDocuSign, Inc. | 0.41% | 0.26% | 0.26% |
 BSYBentley Systems, Inc., Class B | 0.22% | 0.20% | 0.20% |
 ESTCElastic NV | 0.20% | 0.17% | 0.17% |
 RBRKRubrik, Inc., Class A | 0.32% | 0.15% | 0.15% |
 APPFAppfolio, Inc., Class A | 0.16% | 0.12% | 0.12% |
 GTLBGitlab, Inc., Class A | 0.13% | 0.11% | 0.11% |
 SSentinelOne, Inc., Class A | 0.18% | 0.10% | 0.10% |
 RNGRingCentral, Inc., Class A | 0.12% | 0.10% | 0.10% |
 NTNXNutanix, Inc., Class A | 0.44% | 0.09% | 0.09% |
 PTCPTC, Inc. | 0.73% | 0.07% | 0.07% |
 CRCLCircle Internet Group, Inc., Class A | 0.22% | 0.06% | 0.06% |
 PEGAPegasystems, Inc. | 0.17% | 0.05% | 0.05% |
 GENGen Digital, Inc. | 0.44% | 0.04% | 0.04% |
 DBXDropbox, Inc., Class A | 0.17% | 0.04% | 0.04% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do IGV and IWP overlap?
IGV and IWP overlap by 7.2% of portfolio weight. They share 28 holdings (IGV holds 112 positions and IWP holds 277), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both IGV and IWP?
The two portfolios are 7.2% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of IGV and IWP?
The largest positions held by both funds are DDOG, FICO, ZS, GWRE and HUBS. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 74% of the total overlap.
What does IGV own that IWP doesn't?
84 positions (87.4% of IGV) are unique to IGV, led by PLTR, MSFT and ORCL. In the other direction, 249 positions (92.7% of IWP) are unique to IWP.