IGV vs JQUA: Holdings Overlap
IGViShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF
iShares · 112 holdings · $14.7B · as of 2026-03-31
JQUAJPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF
JPMorgan · 289 holdings · $8.2B · as of 2026-04-30
Holdings snapshots are 30 days apart (IGV: 2026-03-31, JQUA: 2026-04-30). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are IGV and JQUA?
iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF (IGV, by iShares) holds 112 positions; JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF (JQUA, by JPMorgan) holds 289. They have 40 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 11.0% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 11.0%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 40IGV holds 112 · JQUA holds 289
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- IGV 75%·JQUA 11%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in IGV
72 of 112 positions (25.2% of the fund) are not held by JQUA. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | IGV | JQUA |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 90.6% | 37.8% |
| Financials | 0.2% | 12.4% |
| Industrials | 0.2% | 10.0% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 0.2% | 9.6% |
| Health Care | 0.0% | 8.5% |
| Other Sectors | 8.2% | 21.6% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts.
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IGV | +9.1% | -2.8% | -6.3% | +13.8% | +4.6% | +16.7% | 0.02% |
| JQUA | +3.6% | +18.6% | +24.4% | +19.8% | +13.4% | — | 1.05% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in IGV vs JQUA →
Shared Holdings(40)
The top 10 shared positions account for 55% of the overlap, led by MSFT, PLTR and PANW.
8.36% | 1.66% | 1.66% | |
8.82% | 0.86% | 0.86% | |
5.48% | 0.61% | 0.61% | |
7.40% | 0.55% | 0.55% | |
4.56% | 0.47% | 0.47% | |
4.27% | 0.45% | 0.45% | |
3.24% | 0.43% | 0.43% | |
4.21% | 0.40% | 0.40% | |
4.75% | 0.35% | 0.35% | |
2.21% | 0.34% | 0.34% | |
1.97% | 0.33% | 0.33% | |
2.17% | 0.31% | 0.31% | |
4.38% | 0.30% | 0.30% | |
0.91% | 0.26% | 0.26% | |
1.66% | 0.24% | 0.24% | |
0.34% | 0.20% | 0.20% | |
1.61% | 0.19% | 0.19% | |
0.73% | 0.18% | 0.18% | |
0.44% | 0.18% | 0.18% | |
0.47% | 0.18% | 0.18% | |
0.22% | 0.17% | 0.17% | |
0.17% | 0.18% | 0.17% | |
0.63% | 0.17% | 0.17% | |
0.17% | 0.16% | 0.16% | |
1.18% | 0.16% | 0.16% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do IGV and JQUA overlap?
IGV and JQUA overlap by 11.0% of portfolio weight. They share 40 holdings (IGV holds 112 positions and JQUA holds 289), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both IGV and JQUA?
The two portfolios are 11.0% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of IGV and JQUA?
The largest positions held by both funds are MSFT, PLTR, PANW, CRM and APP. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 55% of the total overlap.
What does IGV own that JQUA doesn't?
72 positions (25.2% of IGV) are unique to IGV, led by ORCL, SNPS and MSTR. In the other direction, 249 positions (88.6% of JQUA) are unique to JQUA.