IGV vs KOMP: Holdings Overlap
IGViShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF
iShares · 112 holdings · $14.7B · as of 2026-03-31
KOMPState Street® SPDR® S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF
State Street (SPDR) · 501 holdings · $2.6B · as of 2026-08-06
Holdings snapshots are 128 days apart (IGV: 2026-03-31, KOMP: 2026-08-06). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are IGV and KOMP?
iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF (IGV, by iShares) holds 112 positions; State Street® SPDR® S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF (KOMP, by State Street (SPDR)) holds 501. They have 51 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 8.0% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 8.0%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 51IGV holds 112 · KOMP holds 501
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- IGV 47%·KOMP 11%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in IGV
61 of 112 positions (53.3% of the fund) are not held by KOMP. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Only in KOMP
450 of 501 positions (88.5% of the fund) are not held by IGV. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | IGV | KOMP |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 90.6% | 29.9% |
| Industrials | 0.2% | 27.4% |
| Health Care | 0.0% | 12.4% |
| Communication Services | 8.2% | 3.6% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 0.2% | 4.3% |
| Other Sectors | 0.2% | 7.9% |
| Unclassified | 0.5% | 14.3% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (0% of IGV, 14% of KOMP).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IGV | +9.1% | -2.8% | -6.3% | +13.8% | +4.6% | +16.7% | 0.02% |
| KOMP | +3.5% | +18.5% | +29.5% | +17.6% | +3.3% | — | 1.47% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in IGV vs KOMP →
Shared Holdings(51)
The top 10 shared positions account for 41% of the overlap, led by PTC, ADSK and U.
 PTCPTC Inc COM | 0.73% | 0.99% | 0.73% |
|---|---|---|---|
 ADSKAutodesk Inc COM | 2.17% | 0.42% | 0.42% |
 UUnity Software Inc COM | 0.33% | 0.95% | 0.33% |
 TRMBTrimble Inc COM | 0.66% | 0.30% | 0.30% |
 BMNRBitMine Immersion Technologies, Inc. | 0.38% | 0.28% | 0.28% |
 NOWServicenow Inc COM | 4.38% | 0.27% | 0.27% |
 TEAMAtlassian Corporation CL A | 0.50% | 0.25% | 0.25% |
 CRCLCircle Internet Group, Inc., Class A | 0.22% | 0.23% | 0.22% |
 AURAurora Innovation Inc CLASS A COM | 0.22% | 0.22% | 0.22% |
 SNAPSnap, Inc., Class A | 0.22% | 0.58% | 0.22% |
 PANWPalo Alto Networks Inc COM | 5.48% | 0.21% | 0.21% |
 MSFTMicrosoft Corp. COM | 8.36% | 0.21% | 0.21% |
 CRWDCrowdstrike Holdings, Inc., Class A | 4.21% | 0.20% | 0.20% |
 CORZCore Scientific Inc COM | 0.20% | 0.22% | 0.20% |
 HUTHut 8 Corp. COM | 0.19% | 0.27% | 0.19% |
 ZMZoom Communications, Inc., Class A | 0.91% | 0.18% | 0.18% |
 FTNTFortinet Inc COM | 2.21% | 0.18% | 0.18% |
 SNPSSynopsys Inc COM | 3.25% | 0.18% | 0.18% |
 DDOGDatadog, Inc., Class A | 1.66% | 0.18% | 0.18% |
 RIOTRiot Platforms Inc COM | 0.17% | 0.25% | 0.17% |
 DBXDropbox, Inc., Class A | 0.17% | 0.24% | 0.17% |
 RBRKRubrik, Inc., Class A | 0.32% | 0.16% | 0.16% |
 CIFRCipher Digital Inc. COM | 0.16% | 0.26% | 0.16% |
 SSentinelOne, Inc., Class A | 0.18% | 0.15% | 0.15% |
 GENGen Digital Inc COM | 0.44% | 0.15% | 0.15% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do IGV and KOMP overlap?
IGV and KOMP overlap by 8.0% of portfolio weight. They share 51 holdings (IGV holds 112 positions and KOMP holds 501), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both IGV and KOMP?
The two portfolios are 8.0% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of IGV and KOMP?
The largest positions held by both funds are PTC, ADSK, U, TRMB and BMNR. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 41% of the total overlap.
What does IGV own that KOMP doesn't?
61 positions (53.3% of IGV) are unique to IGV, led by PLTR, ORCL and CRM. In the other direction, 450 positions (88.5% of KOMP) are unique to KOMP.