IGV vs MOAT: Holdings Overlap
IGViShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF
iShares · 112 holdings · $14.7B · as of 2026-03-31
MOATVanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF
VanEck · 57 holdings · $12.2B · as of 2026-03-31
How similar are IGV and MOAT?
iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF (IGV, by iShares) holds 112 positions; VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT, by VanEck) holds 57. They have 11 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 13.1% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 13.1%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 11IGV holds 112 · MOAT holds 57
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- IGV 45%·MOAT 15%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in IGV
101 of 112 positions (55.1% of the fund) are not held by MOAT. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | IGV | MOAT |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 90.6% | 25.5% |
| Industrials | 0.2% | 19.3% |
| Consumer Staples | 0.0% | 18.3% |
| Health Care | 0.0% | 18.1% |
| Communication Services | 8.2% | 2.3% |
| Other Sectors | 0.4% | 16.4% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts.
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IGV | +9.1% | -2.8% | -6.3% | +13.8% | +4.6% | +16.7% | 0.02% |
| MOAT | +5.9% | +8.4% | +18.6% | +12.6% | +9.4% | +13.9% | 1.25% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in IGV vs MOAT →
Shared Holdings(11)
The top 10 shared positions account for 95% of the overlap, led by MSFT, FTNT and PANW.
 MSFTMicrosoft Corp. | 8.36% | 2.22% | 2.22% |
|---|---|---|---|
 FTNTFortinet, Inc. | 2.21% | 2.61% | 2.21% |
 PANWPalo Alto Networks, Inc. | 5.48% | 1.30% | 1.30% |
 DDOGDatadog, Inc., Class A | 1.66% | 1.23% | 1.23% |
 FICOFair Isaac Corp. | 1.08% | 0.99% | 0.99% |
 CRMSalesforce, Inc. | 7.40% | 0.98% | 0.98% |
 ADBEAdobe, Inc. | 4.27% | 0.96% | 0.96% |
 ORCLOracle Corp. | 8.24% | 0.90% | 0.90% |
 NOWServiceNow, Inc. | 4.38% | 0.83% | 0.83% |
 WDAYWorkday, Inc., Class A | 1.18% | 0.80% | 0.80% |
 TYLTyler Technologies, Inc. | 0.63% | 2.27% | 0.63% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do IGV and MOAT overlap?
IGV and MOAT overlap by 13.1% of portfolio weight. They share 11 holdings (IGV holds 112 positions and MOAT holds 57), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both IGV and MOAT?
The two portfolios are 13.1% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of IGV and MOAT?
The largest positions held by both funds are MSFT, FTNT, PANW, DDOG and FICO. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 95% of the total overlap.
What does IGV own that MOAT doesn't?
101 positions (55.1% of IGV) are unique to IGV, led by PLTR, INTU and APP. In the other direction, 46 positions (84.8% of MOAT) are unique to MOAT.