IGV vs QQQ: Holdings Overlap
IGViShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF
iShares · 112 holdings · $14.7B · as of 2026-03-31
QQQInvesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Invesco · 101 holdings · $479.2B · as of 2026-03-31
How similar are IGV and QQQ?
iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF (IGV, by iShares) holds 112 positions; Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ, by Invesco) holds 101. They have 19 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 13.7% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 13.7%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 19IGV holds 112 · QQQ holds 101
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- IGV 62%·QQQ 14%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in IGV
93 of 112 positions (38.0% of the fund) are not held by QQQ. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | IGV | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 90.6% | 49.7% |
| Communication Services | 8.2% | 16.0% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 0.2% | 12.6% |
| Consumer Staples | 0.0% | 8.5% |
| Health Care | 0.0% | 5.1% |
| Other Sectors | 0.4% | 8.0% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts.
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IGV | +9.1% | -2.8% | -6.3% | +13.8% | +4.6% | +16.7% | 0.02% |
| QQQ | +1.9% | +18.0% | +27.6% | +25.2% | +15.2% | +20.8% | 0.42% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in IGV vs QQQ →
Shared Holdings(19)
The top 10 shared positions account for 87% of the overlap, led by MSFT, PLTR and PANW.
8.36% | 5.63% | 5.63% | |
8.82% | 1.90% | 1.90% | |
5.48% | 0.74% | 0.74% | |
4.56% | 0.69% | 0.69% | |
4.75% | 0.68% | 0.68% | |
4.27% | 0.56% | 0.56% | |
4.21% | 0.56% | 0.56% | |
3.24% | 0.43% | 0.43% | |
3.25% | 0.43% | 0.43% | |
2.21% | 0.34% | 0.34% | |
1.97% | 0.29% | 0.29% | |
2.17% | 0.29% | 0.29% | |
1.67% | 0.22% | 0.22% | |
1.66% | 0.22% | 0.22% | |
1.47% | 0.21% | 0.21% | |
1.61% | 0.21% | 0.21% | |
1.18% | 0.16% | 0.16% | |
0.61% | 0.13% | 0.13% | |
0.50% | 0.07% | 0.07% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do IGV and QQQ overlap?
IGV and QQQ overlap by 13.7% of portfolio weight. They share 19 holdings (IGV holds 112 positions and QQQ holds 101), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both IGV and QQQ?
The two portfolios are 13.7% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of IGV and QQQ?
The largest positions held by both funds are MSFT, PLTR, PANW, APP and INTU. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 87% of the total overlap.
What does IGV own that QQQ doesn't?
93 positions (38.0% of IGV) are unique to IGV, led by ORCL, CRM and NOW. In the other direction, 82 positions (86.2% of QQQ) are unique to QQQ.