IJH vs XMMO: Holdings Overlap
IJHiShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF
iShares · 399 holdings · $126.1B · as of 2026-03-31
XMMOInvesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF
Invesco · 76 holdings · $7.2B · as of 2026-04-30
Holdings snapshots are 30 days apart (IJH: 2026-03-31, XMMO: 2026-04-30). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are IJH and XMMO?
iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF (IJH, by iShares) holds 399 positions; Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO, by Invesco) holds 76. They have 76 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 27.4% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 27.4%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 76IJH holds 399 · XMMO holds 76
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- IJH 27%·XMMO 100%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in IJH
323 of 399 positions (72.0% of the fund) are not held by XMMO. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Only in XMMO
Every position in XMMO is also held by IJH, so it brings nothing the other fund doesn’t already own.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | IJH | XMMO |
|---|---|---|
| Industrials | 25.3% | 40.3% |
| Information Technology | 12.3% | 15.0% |
| Financials | 14.6% | 3.8% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 11.3% | 6.1% |
| Health Care | 8.9% | 6.3% |
| Other Sectors | 27.1% | 28.2% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts.
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IJH | +3.1% | +18.4% | +26.0% | +14.5% | +9.0% | +11.2% | 1.14% |
| XMMO | +1.1% | +17.4% | +26.1% | +25.9% | +14.3% | +18.6% | 0.60% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in IJH vs XMMO →
Shared Holdings(76)
The top 10 shared positions account for 25% of the overlap, led by FTI, CW and FLEX.
0.87% | 3.60% | 0.87% | |
0.78% | 3.91% | 0.78% | |
0.75% | 2.56% | 0.75% | |
0.67% | 2.58% | 0.67% | |
0.64% | 2.60% | 0.64% | |
0.62% | 2.63% | 0.62% | |
0.62% | 2.26% | 0.62% | |
0.61% | 1.74% | 0.61% | |
0.60% | 2.32% | 0.60% | |
0.58% | 2.21% | 0.58% | |
0.58% | 2.86% | 0.58% | |
0.56% | 2.21% | 0.56% | |
0.56% | 1.50% | 0.56% | |
0.54% | 1.25% | 0.54% | |
0.54% | 1.77% | 0.54% | |
0.49% | 2.03% | 0.49% | |
0.48% | 1.25% | 0.48% | |
0.48% | 1.92% | 0.48% | |
0.47% | 1.35% | 0.47% | |
0.47% | 1.60% | 0.47% | |
0.46% | 1.16% | 0.46% | |
0.45% | 1.49% | 0.45% | |
0.43% | 1.09% | 0.43% | |
0.43% | 1.13% | 0.43% | |
0.42% | 1.05% | 0.42% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do IJH and XMMO overlap?
IJH and XMMO overlap by 27.4% of portfolio weight. They share 76 holdings (IJH holds 399 positions and XMMO holds 76), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both IJH and XMMO?
The two portfolios are 27.4% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of IJH and XMMO?
The largest positions held by both funds are FTI, CW, FLEX, WWD and RGLD. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 25% of the total overlap.
What does IJH own that XMMO doesn't?
323 positions (72.0% of IJH) are unique to IJH, led by CASY, UTHR and XPO. In the other direction, 0 positions (0.0% of XMMO) are unique to XMMO.