IJJ vs IYK: Holdings Overlap
IJJiShares S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF
iShares · 301 holdings · $9.0B · as of 2026-03-31
IYKiShares U.S. Consumer Staples ETF
iShares · 54 holdings · $1.4B · as of 2026-04-30
Holdings snapshots are 30 days apart (IJJ: 2026-03-31, IYK: 2026-04-30). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are IJJ and IYK?
iShares S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF (IJJ, by iShares) holds 301 positions; iShares U.S. Consumer Staples ETF (IYK, by iShares) holds 54. They have 11 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 3.6% identical. In practical terms the pair is essentially distinct, holding almost none of the same securities.
- Overlap by Weight
- 3.6%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 11IJJ holds 301 · IYK holds 54
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- IJJ 5%·IYK 4%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in IJJ
290 of 301 positions (94.6% of the fund) are not held by IYK. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | IJJ | IYK |
|---|---|---|
| Consumer Staples | 6.1% | 86.1% |
| Financials | 22.4% | 0.0% |
| Industrials | 19.0% | 0.0% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 12.4% | 0.0% |
| Health Care | 3.2% | 10.8% |
| Other Sectors | 36.1% | 2.7% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts.
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IJJ | +3.0% | +15.1% | +23.8% | +12.8% | +9.2% | +10.5% | 1.56% |
| IYK | -0.8% | +12.4% | +9.8% | +6.0% | +6.4% | +9.2% | 2.55% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in IJJ vs IYK →
Shared Holdings(11)
The top 10 shared positions account for 98% of the overlap, led by USFD, PFGC and DAR.
1.30% | 1.01% | 1.01% | |
0.86% | 0.67% | 0.67% | |
0.62% | 0.49% | 0.49% | |
0.45% | 0.34% | 0.34% | |
0.40% | 0.29% | 0.29% | |
0.29% | 0.39% | 0.29% | |
0.27% | 0.23% | 0.23% | |
0.11% | 0.09% | 0.09% | |
0.11% | 0.08% | 0.08% | |
0.07% | 0.10% | 0.07% | |
0.10% | 0.07% | 0.07% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do IJJ and IYK overlap?
IJJ and IYK overlap by 3.6% of portfolio weight. They share 11 holdings (IJJ holds 301 positions and IYK holds 54), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both IJJ and IYK?
The two portfolios are 3.6% identical by weight. Owning both is genuine diversification: the funds hold almost none of the same securities.
What are the biggest shared holdings of IJJ and IYK?
The largest positions held by both funds are USFD, PFGC, DAR, INGR and ACI. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 98% of the total overlap.
What does IJJ own that IYK doesn't?
290 positions (94.6% of IJJ) are unique to IJJ, led by AA, OVV and RS. In the other direction, 43 positions (95.9% of IYK) are unique to IYK.