IJJ vs PAVE: Holdings Overlap
IJJiShares S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF
iShares · 301 holdings · $9.0B · as of 2026-03-31
PAVEGlobal X U.S. Infrastructure Development ETF
Global X · 100 holdings · $14.1B · as of 2026-05-31
Holdings snapshots are 61 days apart (IJJ: 2026-03-31, PAVE: 2026-05-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are IJJ and PAVE?
iShares S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF (IJJ, by iShares) holds 301 positions; Global X U.S. Infrastructure Development ETF (PAVE, by Global X) holds 100. They have 22 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 8.9% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 8.9%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 22IJJ holds 301 · PAVE holds 100
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- IJJ 9%·PAVE 13%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in IJJ
279 of 301 positions (90.0% of the fund) are not held by PAVE. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Only in PAVE
78 of 100 positions (86.7% of the fund) are not held by IJJ. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | IJJ | PAVE |
|---|---|---|
| Industrials | 19.0% | 75.1% |
| Financials | 22.4% | 0.0% |
| Materials | 8.2% | 20.3% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 12.4% | 0.0% |
| Real Estate | 8.2% | 0.0% |
| Other Sectors | 28.9% | 4.3% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts.
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IJJ | +3.0% | +15.1% | +23.8% | +12.8% | +9.2% | +10.5% | 1.56% |
| PAVE | +4.0% | +23.0% | +29.9% | +22.7% | +18.1% | — | 0.73% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in IJJ vs PAVE →
Shared Holdings(22)
The top 10 shared positions account for 70% of the overlap, led by AA, RS and WCC.
1.09% | 1.09% | 1.09% | |
1.01% | 1.08% | 1.01% | |
0.84% | 0.95% | 0.84% | |
0.79% | 0.73% | 0.73% | |
0.49% | 0.78% | 0.49% | |
0.48% | 0.74% | 0.48% | |
0.44% | 0.68% | 0.44% | |
0.43% | 0.46% | 0.43% | |
0.39% | 0.49% | 0.39% | |
0.31% | 0.42% | 0.31% | |
0.29% | 0.29% | 0.29% | |
0.28% | 0.77% | 0.28% | |
0.28% | 0.59% | 0.28% | |
0.26% | 0.57% | 0.26% | |
0.43% | 0.26% | 0.26% | |
0.25% | 0.60% | 0.25% | |
0.22% | 0.77% | 0.22% | |
0.20% | 0.55% | 0.20% | |
0.19% | 0.38% | 0.19% | |
0.18% | 0.28% | 0.18% | |
0.17% | 0.51% | 0.17% | |
0.10% | 0.21% | 0.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do IJJ and PAVE overlap?
IJJ and PAVE overlap by 8.9% of portfolio weight. They share 22 holdings (IJJ holds 301 positions and PAVE holds 100), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both IJJ and PAVE?
The two portfolios are 8.9% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of IJJ and PAVE?
The largest positions held by both funds are AA, RS, WCC, RRX and CSL. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 70% of the total overlap.
What does IJJ own that PAVE doesn't?
279 positions (90.0% of IJJ) are unique to IJJ, led by USFD, OVV and PR. In the other direction, 78 positions (86.7% of PAVE) are unique to PAVE.