IJK vs IJH: Holdings Overlap
IJKiShares S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth ETF
iShares · 242 holdings · $11.0B · as of 2026-03-31
IJHiShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF
iShares · 399 holdings · $126.1B · as of 2026-03-31
How similar are IJK and IJH?
iShares S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth ETF (IJK, by iShares) holds 242 positions; iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF (IJH, by iShares) holds 399. They have 242 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 64.8% identical. In practical terms the pair is heavily overlapping, with largely the same stocks driving both funds.
- Overlap by Weight
- 64.8%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 242IJK holds 242 · IJH holds 399
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- IJK 100%·IJH 66%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in IJK
Every position in IJK is also held by IJH, so it brings nothing the other fund doesn’t already own.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | IJK | IJH |
|---|---|---|
| Industrials | 31.3% | 25.3% |
| Information Technology | 17.3% | 12.3% |
| Financials | 7.2% | 14.6% |
| Health Care | 14.4% | 8.9% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 10.2% | 11.3% |
| Other Sectors | 19.4% | 27.1% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts.
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IJK | +3.1% | +21.4% | +27.9% | +15.9% | +8.4% | +11.3% | 0.52% |
| IJH | +3.1% | +18.4% | +26.0% | +14.5% | +9.0% | +11.2% | 1.14% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in IJK vs IJH →
Shared Holdings(242)
The top 10 shared positions account for 11% of the overlap, led by FTI, CASY and UTHR.
1.71% | 0.87% | 0.87% | |
1.65% | 0.84% | 0.84% | |
1.57% | 0.80% | 0.80% | |
1.54% | 0.78% | 0.78% | |
1.48% | 0.75% | 0.75% | |
1.40% | 0.71% | 0.71% | |
1.31% | 0.67% | 0.67% | |
1.26% | 0.64% | 0.64% | |
0.76% | 0.63% | 0.63% | |
1.21% | 0.62% | 0.62% | |
1.21% | 0.62% | 0.62% | |
1.20% | 0.61% | 0.61% | |
1.17% | 0.60% | 0.60% | |
1.17% | 0.60% | 0.60% | |
0.62% | 0.59% | 0.59% | |
1.15% | 0.58% | 0.58% | |
1.15% | 0.58% | 0.58% | |
1.14% | 0.58% | 0.58% | |
0.71% | 0.56% | 0.56% | |
1.09% | 0.56% | 0.56% | |
1.05% | 0.54% | 0.54% | |
1.02% | 0.52% | 0.52% | |
1.00% | 0.51% | 0.51% | |
0.95% | 0.49% | 0.49% | |
0.95% | 0.48% | 0.48% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do IJK and IJH overlap?
IJK and IJH overlap by 64.8% of portfolio weight. They share 242 holdings (IJK holds 242 positions and IJH holds 399), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both IJK and IJH?
The two portfolios are 64.8% identical by weight. Owning both mostly doubles down on the shared core rather than diversifying: the same large positions drive both funds.
What are the biggest shared holdings of IJK and IJH?
The largest positions held by both funds are FTI, CASY, UTHR, CW and FLEX. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 11% of the total overlap.
What does IJK own that IJH doesn't?
Nothing. Every position in IJK is also held by IJH. In the other direction, 157 positions (33.0% of IJH) are unique to IJH.