IJK vs XMHQ: Holdings Overlap
IJKiShares S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth ETF
iShares · 242 holdings · $11.0B · as of 2026-03-31
XMHQInvesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF
Invesco · 80 holdings · $5.5B · as of 2026-04-30
Holdings snapshots are 30 days apart (IJK: 2026-03-31, XMHQ: 2026-04-30). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are IJK and XMHQ?
iShares S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth ETF (IJK, by iShares) holds 242 positions; Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF (XMHQ, by Invesco) holds 80. They have 63 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 27.1% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 27.1%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 63IJK holds 242 · XMHQ holds 80
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- IJK 27%·XMHQ 87%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in IJK
179 of 242 positions (72.7% of the fund) are not held by XMHQ. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | IJK | XMHQ |
|---|---|---|
| Industrials | 31.3% | 28.5% |
| Health Care | 14.4% | 19.7% |
| Information Technology | 17.3% | 8.4% |
| Financials | 7.2% | 15.1% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 10.2% | 9.5% |
| Other Sectors | 19.4% | 18.8% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts.
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IJK | +3.1% | +21.4% | +27.9% | +15.9% | +8.4% | +11.3% | 0.52% |
| XMHQ | +4.3% | +16.0% | +18.7% | +14.6% | +10.6% | +13.0% | 0.55% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in IJK vs XMHQ →
Shared Holdings(63)
The top 10 shared positions account for 41% of the overlap, led by FTI, UTHR and RGLD.
1.71% | 4.95% | 1.71% | |
1.57% | 3.98% | 1.57% | |
1.26% | 2.38% | 1.26% | |
1.20% | 2.72% | 1.20% | |
1.17% | 3.00% | 1.17% | |
1.15% | 2.35% | 1.15% | |
0.89% | 2.22% | 0.89% | |
0.79% | 1.93% | 0.79% | |
0.77% | 2.61% | 0.77% | |
0.73% | 1.44% | 0.73% | |
0.71% | 2.53% | 0.71% | |
0.68% | 2.13% | 0.68% | |
0.67% | 1.48% | 0.67% | |
0.66% | 2.54% | 0.66% | |
0.62% | 3.55% | 0.62% | |
0.60% | 1.46% | 0.60% | |
0.59% | 1.28% | 0.59% | |
0.57% | 1.99% | 0.57% | |
0.47% | 0.99% | 0.47% | |
0.46% | 1.19% | 0.46% | |
0.46% | 0.85% | 0.46% | |
0.44% | 1.52% | 0.44% | |
0.44% | 1.80% | 0.44% | |
0.41% | 1.72% | 0.41% | |
0.40% | 1.30% | 0.40% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do IJK and XMHQ overlap?
IJK and XMHQ overlap by 27.1% of portfolio weight. They share 63 holdings (IJK holds 242 positions and XMHQ holds 80), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both IJK and XMHQ?
The two portfolios are 27.1% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of IJK and XMHQ?
The largest positions held by both funds are FTI, UTHR, RGLD, CRS and TWLO. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 41% of the total overlap.
What does IJK own that XMHQ doesn't?
179 positions (72.7% of IJK) are unique to IJK, led by CASY, CW and FLEX. In the other direction, 17 positions (12.9% of XMHQ) are unique to XMHQ.