IJK vs XMMO: Holdings Overlap
IJKiShares S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth ETF
iShares · 242 holdings · $11.0B · as of 2026-03-31
XMMOInvesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF
Invesco · 76 holdings · $7.2B · as of 2026-04-30
Holdings snapshots are 30 days apart (IJK: 2026-03-31, XMMO: 2026-04-30). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are IJK and XMMO?
iShares S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth ETF (IJK, by iShares) holds 242 positions; Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO, by Invesco) holds 76. They have 66 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 42.9% identical. In practical terms the pair is moderately overlapping; they share a meaningful core, but each fund adds distinct exposure.
- Overlap by Weight
- 42.9%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 66IJK holds 242 · XMMO holds 76
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- IJK 43%·XMMO 90%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in IJK
176 of 242 positions (56.9% of the fund) are not held by XMMO. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | IJK | XMMO |
|---|---|---|
| Industrials | 31.3% | 40.3% |
| Information Technology | 17.3% | 15.0% |
| Health Care | 14.4% | 6.3% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 10.2% | 6.1% |
| Materials | 3.6% | 7.9% |
| Other Sectors | 23.0% | 24.1% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts.
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IJK | +3.1% | +21.4% | +27.9% | +15.9% | +8.4% | +11.3% | 0.52% |
| XMMO | +1.1% | +17.4% | +26.1% | +25.9% | +14.3% | +18.6% | 0.60% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in IJK vs XMMO →
Shared Holdings(66)
The top 10 shared positions account for 31% of the overlap, led by FTI, CW and FLEX.
1.71% | 3.60% | 1.71% | |
1.54% | 3.91% | 1.54% | |
1.48% | 2.56% | 1.48% | |
1.31% | 2.58% | 1.31% | |
1.26% | 2.60% | 1.26% | |
1.21% | 2.63% | 1.21% | |
1.21% | 2.26% | 1.21% | |
1.20% | 1.74% | 1.20% | |
1.17% | 2.32% | 1.17% | |
1.15% | 2.21% | 1.15% | |
1.15% | 2.86% | 1.15% | |
1.09% | 1.50% | 1.09% | |
1.05% | 1.77% | 1.05% | |
0.95% | 2.03% | 0.95% | |
0.95% | 1.25% | 0.95% | |
0.89% | 1.16% | 0.89% | |
0.88% | 1.49% | 0.88% | |
0.83% | 1.05% | 0.83% | |
0.80% | 1.86% | 0.80% | |
0.79% | 0.80% | 0.79% | |
0.77% | 1.38% | 0.77% | |
0.77% | 2.16% | 0.77% | |
0.77% | 1.93% | 0.77% | |
0.75% | 1.83% | 0.75% | |
0.74% | 1.21% | 0.74% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do IJK and XMMO overlap?
IJK and XMMO overlap by 42.9% of portfolio weight. They share 66 holdings (IJK holds 242 positions and XMMO holds 76), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both IJK and XMMO?
The two portfolios are 42.9% identical by weight. Owning both is defensible: they share a meaningful core, but each fund adds exposure the other lacks.
What are the biggest shared holdings of IJK and XMMO?
The largest positions held by both funds are FTI, CW, FLEX, WWD and RGLD. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 31% of the total overlap.
What does IJK own that XMMO doesn't?
176 positions (56.9% of IJK) are unique to IJK, led by CASY, UTHR and XPO. In the other direction, 10 positions (9.2% of XMMO) are unique to XMMO.