IJR vs IWP: Holdings Overlap
IJRiShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF
iShares · 605 holdings · $113.4B · as of 2026-03-31
IWPiShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF
iShares · 277 holdings · $20.5B · as of 2026-03-31
How similar are IJR and IWP?
iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF (IJR, by iShares) holds 605 positions; iShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF (IWP, by iShares) holds 277. They have 17 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 1.3% identical. In practical terms the pair is essentially distinct, holding almost none of the same securities.
- Overlap by Weight
- 1.3%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 17IJR holds 605 · IWP holds 277
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- IJR 4%·IWP 1%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in IJR
588 of 605 positions (94.3% of the fund) are not held by IWP. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Only in IWP
260 of 277 positions (98.6% of the fund) are not held by IJR. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | IJR | IWP |
|---|---|---|
| Industrials | 17.1% | 24.4% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 13.2% | 21.2% |
| Financials | 17.4% | 8.5% |
| Information Technology | 12.7% | 15.6% |
| Health Care | 11.1% | 14.9% |
| Other Sectors | 26.0% | 15.3% |
| Unclassified | 0.9% | 0.0% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (1% of IJR, 0% of IWP).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IJR | +2.4% | +24.5% | +36.4% | +14.5% | +7.7% | +10.9% | 1.10% |
| IWP | +1.5% | +5.4% | +3.1% | +14.6% | +5.1% | +12.1% | 0.34% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in IJR vs IWP →
Shared Holdings(17)
The top 10 shared positions account for 88% of the overlap, led by ENPH, 1JK and CORT.
0.32% | 0.17% | 0.17% | |
0.27% | 0.16% | 0.16% | |
0.25% | 0.14% | 0.14% | |
0.45% | 0.13% | 0.13% | |
0.39% | 0.12% | 0.12% | |
0.18% | 0.10% | 0.10% | |
0.32% | 0.10% | 0.10% | |
0.46% | 0.07% | 0.07% | |
0.15% | 0.06% | 0.06% | |
0.09% | 0.05% | 0.05% | |
0.35% | 0.03% | 0.03% | |
0.21% | 0.03% | 0.03% | |
0.19% | 0.03% | 0.03% | |
0.08% | 0.02% | 0.02% | |
0.16% | 0.02% | 0.02% | |
0.07% | 0.02% | 0.02% | |
0.19% | 0.01% | 0.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do IJR and IWP overlap?
IJR and IWP overlap by 1.3% of portfolio weight. They share 17 holdings (IJR holds 605 positions and IWP holds 277), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both IJR and IWP?
The two portfolios are 1.3% identical by weight. Owning both is genuine diversification: the funds hold almost none of the same securities.
What are the biggest shared holdings of IJR and IWP?
The largest positions held by both funds are ENPH, 1JK, CORT, MOH and PAYC. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 88% of the total overlap.
What does IJR own that IWP doesn't?
588 positions (94.3% of IJR) are unique to IJR, led by EMN, ESI and PRIM. In the other direction, 260 positions (98.6% of IWP) are unique to IWP.