IJR vs MLPX: Holdings Overlap
IJRiShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF
iShares · 605 holdings · $113.4B · as of 2026-03-31
MLPXGlobal X MLP and Energy Infrastructure ETF
Global X · 28 holdings · $3.6B · as of 2026-05-31
Holdings snapshots are 61 days apart (IJR: 2026-03-31, MLPX: 2026-05-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are IJR and MLPX?
iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF (IJR, by iShares) holds 605 positions; Global X MLP and Energy Infrastructure ETF (MLPX, by Global X) holds 28. They have 3 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 0.9% identical. In practical terms the pair is essentially distinct, holding almost none of the same securities.
- Overlap by Weight
- 0.9%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 3IJR holds 605 · MLPX holds 28
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- IJR 1%·MLPX 4%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in IJR
602 of 605 positions (97.6% of the fund) are not held by MLPX. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | IJR | MLPX |
|---|---|---|
| Energy | 6.5% | 99.5% |
| Financials | 17.4% | 0.0% |
| Industrials | 17.1% | 0.0% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 13.2% | 0.0% |
| Information Technology | 12.7% | 0.0% |
| Other Sectors | 30.6% | 0.0% |
| Unclassified | 0.9% | 0.3% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (1% of IJR, 0% of MLPX).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IJR | +2.4% | +24.5% | +36.4% | +14.5% | +7.7% | +10.9% | 1.10% |
| MLPX | -3.0% | +23.1% | +25.2% | +25.3% | +22.4% | +11.8% | 3.17% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in IJR vs MLPX →
Shared Holdings(3)
The top 3 shared positions account for 100% of the overlap, led by AROC, KGS and KNTK.
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do IJR and MLPX overlap?
IJR and MLPX overlap by 0.9% of portfolio weight. They share 3 holdings (IJR holds 605 positions and MLPX holds 28), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both IJR and MLPX?
The two portfolios are 0.9% identical by weight. Owning both is genuine diversification: the funds hold almost none of the same securities.
What are the biggest shared holdings of IJR and MLPX?
The largest positions held by both funds are AROC, KGS and KNTK. Together the top 3 shared positions account for 100% of the total overlap.
What does IJR own that MLPX doesn't?
602 positions (97.6% of IJR) are unique to IJR, led by EMN, ESI and PRIM. In the other direction, 25 positions (95.3% of MLPX) are unique to MLPX.