IJR vs VTWO: Holdings Overlap
IJRiShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF
iShares · 605 holdings · $113.4B · as of 2026-03-31
VTWOVanguard Russell 2000 Index Fund
Vanguard · 1952 holdings · $17.4B · as of 2026-05-31
Holdings snapshots are 61 days apart (IJR: 2026-03-31, VTWO: 2026-05-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are IJR and VTWO?
iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF (IJR, by iShares) holds 605 positions; Vanguard Russell 2000 Index Fund (VTWO, by Vanguard) holds 1952. They have 527 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 40.4% identical. In practical terms the pair is moderately overlapping; they share a meaningful core, but each fund adds distinct exposure.
- Overlap by Weight
- 40.4%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 527IJR holds 605 · VTWO holds 1952
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- IJR 80%·VTWO 41%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in IJR
78 of 605 positions (18.2% of the fund) are not held by VTWO. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Only in VTWO
1425 of 1952 positions (59.0% of the fund) are not held by IJR. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | IJR | VTWO |
|---|---|---|
| Industrials | 17.1% | 19.4% |
| Information Technology | 12.7% | 17.8% |
| Financials | 17.4% | 14.3% |
| Health Care | 11.1% | 15.5% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 13.2% | 7.3% |
| Other Sectors | 26.0% | 20.8% |
| Unclassified | 0.9% | 4.8% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (1% of IJR, 5% of VTWO).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IJR | +2.4% | +24.5% | +36.4% | +14.5% | +7.7% | +10.9% | 1.10% |
| VTWO | +1.8% | +23.1% | +38.8% | +17.3% | +7.7% | +11.0% | 1.07% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in IJR vs VTWO →
Shared Holdings(527)
The top 10 shared positions account for 8% of the overlap, led by SMTC, SANM and DOCN.
0.46% | 0.42% | 0.42% | |
0.46% | 0.41% | 0.41% | |
0.44% | 0.35% | 0.35% | |
0.50% | 0.33% | 0.33% | |
0.36% | 0.31% | 0.31% | |
0.41% | 0.29% | 0.29% | |
0.49% | 0.28% | 0.28% | |
0.49% | 0.26% | 0.26% | |
0.37% | 0.24% | 0.24% | |
0.33% | 0.24% | 0.24% | |
0.37% | 0.23% | 0.23% | |
0.44% | 0.22% | 0.22% | |
0.46% | 0.22% | 0.22% | |
0.48% | 0.22% | 0.22% | |
0.29% | 0.21% | 0.21% | |
0.35% | 0.21% | 0.21% | |
0.38% | 0.21% | 0.21% | |
0.43% | 0.21% | 0.21% | |
0.43% | 0.21% | 0.21% | |
0.38% | 0.20% | 0.20% | |
0.20% | 0.20% | 0.20% | |
0.50% | 0.20% | 0.20% | |
0.42% | 0.20% | 0.20% | |
0.34% | 0.19% | 0.19% | |
0.43% | 0.19% | 0.19% |
Showing the top 250 of 527 shared holdings by overlap weight.
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do IJR and VTWO overlap?
IJR and VTWO overlap by 40.4% of portfolio weight. They share 527 holdings (IJR holds 605 positions and VTWO holds 1952), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both IJR and VTWO?
The two portfolios are 40.4% identical by weight. Owning both is defensible: they share a meaningful core, but each fund adds exposure the other lacks.
What are the biggest shared holdings of IJR and VTWO?
The largest positions held by both funds are SMTC, SANM, DOCN, VIAV and LUMN. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 8% of the total overlap.
What does IJR own that VTWO doesn't?
78 positions (18.2% of IJR) are unique to IJR, led by EMN, ESI and LKQ. In the other direction, 1425 positions (59.0% of VTWO) are unique to VTWO.