IJS vs ITB: Holdings Overlap
IJSiShares S&P Small-Cap 600 Value ETF
iShares · 458 holdings · $8.4B · as of 2026-03-31
ITBiShares U.S. Home Construction ETF
iShares · 46 holdings · $2.3B · as of 2026-03-31
How similar are IJS and ITB?
iShares S&P Small-Cap 600 Value ETF (IJS, by iShares) holds 458 positions; iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF (ITB, by iShares) holds 46. They have 18 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 4.1% identical. In practical terms the pair is essentially distinct, holding almost none of the same securities.
- Overlap by Weight
- 4.1%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 18IJS holds 458 · ITB holds 46
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- IJS 4%·ITB 12%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in IJS
440 of 458 positions (94.5% of the fund) are not held by ITB. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | IJS | ITB |
|---|---|---|
| Consumer Discretionary | 15.4% | 73.0% |
| Industrials | 12.4% | 20.8% |
| Financials | 20.6% | 0.0% |
| Information Technology | 9.8% | 0.0% |
| Energy | 8.6% | 0.0% |
| Other Sectors | 30.7% | 6.0% |
| Unclassified | 0.9% | 0.0% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (1% of IJS, 0% of ITB).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IJS | +3.6% | +23.1% | +39.5% | +13.6% | +8.2% | +10.2% | 1.29% |
| ITB | +1.3% | +5.4% | -1.5% | +5.3% | +8.1% | +14.1% | 0.64% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in IJS vs ITB →
Shared Holdings(18)
The top 10 shared positions account for 80% of the overlap, led by MHK, MTH and T86.
0.66% | 1.14% | 0.66% | |
0.53% | 1.68% | 0.53% | |
0.51% | 1.60% | 0.51% | |
0.41% | 1.30% | 0.41% | |
0.29% | 1.67% | 0.29% | |
0.19% | 0.59% | 0.19% | |
0.18% | 0.59% | 0.18% | |
0.17% | 0.30% | 0.17% | |
0.17% | 0.30% | 0.17% | |
0.15% | 0.26% | 0.15% | |
0.15% | 0.63% | 0.15% | |
0.14% | 0.23% | 0.14% | |
0.11% | 0.80% | 0.11% | |
0.11% | 0.18% | 0.11% | |
0.10% | 0.33% | 0.10% | |
0.07% | 0.13% | 0.07% | |
0.07% | 0.11% | 0.07% | |
0.05% | 0.16% | 0.05% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do IJS and ITB overlap?
IJS and ITB overlap by 4.1% of portfolio weight. They share 18 holdings (IJS holds 458 positions and ITB holds 46), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both IJS and ITB?
The two portfolios are 4.1% identical by weight. Owning both is genuine diversification: the funds hold almost none of the same securities.
What are the biggest shared holdings of IJS and ITB?
The largest positions held by both funds are MHK, MTH, T86, MHO and SKY. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 80% of the total overlap.
What does IJS own that ITB doesn't?
440 positions (94.5% of IJS) are unique to IJS, led by EMN, LKQ and MTCH. In the other direction, 28 positions (87.8% of ITB) are unique to ITB.