IJS vs IWR: Holdings Overlap
IJSiShares S&P Small-Cap 600 Value ETF
iShares · 458 holdings · $8.4B · as of 2026-03-31
IWRiShares Russell Mid-Cap ETF
iShares · 806 holdings · $57.6B · as of 2026-03-31
How similar are IJS and IWR?
iShares S&P Small-Cap 600 Value ETF (IJS, by iShares) holds 458 positions; iShares Russell Mid-Cap ETF (IWR, by iShares) holds 806. They have 56 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 1.6% identical. In practical terms the pair is essentially distinct, holding almost none of the same securities.
- Overlap by Weight
- 1.6%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 56IJS holds 458 · IWR holds 806
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- IJS 21%·IWR 2%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in IJS
402 of 458 positions (77.3% of the fund) are not held by IWR. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | IJS | IWR |
|---|---|---|
| Financials | 20.6% | 13.6% |
| Industrials | 12.4% | 18.7% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 15.4% | 10.8% |
| Information Technology | 9.8% | 13.0% |
| Health Care | 7.2% | 9.2% |
| Other Sectors | 32.1% | 34.3% |
| Unclassified | 0.9% | 0.1% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (1% of IJS, 0% of IWR).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IJS | +3.6% | +23.1% | +39.5% | +13.6% | +8.2% | +10.2% | 1.29% |
| IWR | +2.9% | +18.1% | +23.0% | +16.4% | +8.5% | +11.6% | 1.12% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in IJS vs IWR →
Shared Holdings(56)
The top 10 shared positions account for 34% of the overlap, led by EMN, ESI and LKQ.
 EMNEastman Chemical Company COM | 1.12% | 0.07% | 0.07% |
|---|---|---|---|
 ESIElement Solutions Inc COM | 0.50% | 0.06% | 0.06% |
 LKQLKQ Corporation COM | 0.97% | 0.06% | 0.06% |
 MTCHMatch Group Inc COM | 0.93% | 0.06% | 0.06% |
 CECelanese Corporation COM | 0.93% | 0.06% | 0.06% |
 MOHMolina Healthcare, Inc. COM | 0.88% | 0.05% | 0.05% |
 AVLAAir Lease Corporation CL A | 0.38% | 0.05% | 0.05% |
 QRVOQorvo Inc COM | 0.31% | 0.05% | 0.05% |
 SDASealed Air Corp. COM | 0.32% | 0.05% | 0.05% |
 PAYCPaycom Software Inc COM | 0.77% | 0.05% | 0.05% |
 KMXCarmax Inc COM | 0.76% | 0.05% | 0.05% |
| Gates Industrial Corp PLC COM USD0.01 | 0.34% | 0.05% | 0.05% |
 LWLamb Weston Holdings Inc COM | 0.76% | 0.05% | 0.05% |
 MKTXMarketAxess Holdings Inc. COM | 0.34% | 0.04% | 0.04% |
 CZRCaesars Entertainment Inc. COM | 0.70% | 0.04% | 0.04% |
 TFXTeleflex Incorporated COM | 0.68% | 0.04% | 0.04% |
 RITMRithm Capital Corp. COM NEW | 0.68% | 0.04% | 0.04% |
 MHKMohawk Industries, Inc. COM | 0.66% | 0.04% | 0.04% |
 ENPHEnphase Energy Inc COM | 0.64% | 0.04% | 0.04% |
 RALRalliant Corp. COM | 0.29% | 0.04% | 0.04% |
 LNCLincoln National Corp. COM | 0.70% | 0.04% | 0.04% |
 MRPMillrose Properties, Inc., Class A | 0.23% | 0.03% | 0.03% |
 MDUMDU Resources Group, Inc. COM | 0.55% | 0.03% | 0.03% |
 AMTMAmentum Holdings, Inc. COM | 0.52% | 0.03% | 0.03% |
 AGOAssured Guaranty Ltd. COM USD0.01 | 0.22% | 0.03% | 0.03% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do IJS and IWR overlap?
IJS and IWR overlap by 1.6% of portfolio weight. They share 56 holdings (IJS holds 458 positions and IWR holds 806), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both IJS and IWR?
The two portfolios are 1.6% identical by weight. Owning both is genuine diversification: the funds hold almost none of the same securities.
What are the biggest shared holdings of IJS and IWR?
The largest positions held by both funds are EMN, ESI, LKQ, MTCH and CE. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 34% of the total overlap.
What does IJS own that IWR doesn't?
402 positions (77.3% of IJS) are unique to IJS, led by SM, MGY and CRC. In the other direction, 750 positions (98.1% of IWR) are unique to IWR.