IJS vs XME: Holdings Overlap
IJSiShares S&P Small-Cap 600 Value ETF
iShares · 458 holdings · $8.4B · as of 2026-03-31
XMEState Street® SPDR® S&P® Metals & Mining ETF
State Street (SPDR) · 39 holdings · $4.0B · as of 2026-08-06
Holdings snapshots are 128 days apart (IJS: 2026-03-31, XME: 2026-08-06). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are IJS and XME?
iShares S&P Small-Cap 600 Value ETF (IJS, by iShares) holds 458 positions; State Street® SPDR® S&P® Metals & Mining ETF (XME, by State Street (SPDR)) holds 39. They have 9 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 2.6% identical. In practical terms the pair is essentially distinct, holding almost none of the same securities.
- Overlap by Weight
- 2.6%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 9IJS holds 458 · XME holds 39
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- IJS 3%·XME 24%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in IJS
449 of 458 positions (95.9% of the fund) are not held by XME. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | IJS | XME |
|---|---|---|
| Materials | 6.7% | 76.0% |
| Financials | 20.6% | 0.0% |
| Energy | 8.6% | 20.5% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 15.4% | 0.0% |
| Industrials | 12.4% | 0.0% |
| Other Sectors | 33.9% | 0.0% |
| Unclassified | 0.9% | 3.4% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (1% of IJS, 3% of XME).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IJS | +3.6% | +23.1% | +39.5% | +13.6% | +8.2% | +10.2% | 1.29% |
| XME | +12.9% | +11.8% | +49.0% | +31.5% | +22.7% | +16.4% | 0.32% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in IJS vs XME →
Shared Holdings(9)
The top 9 shared positions account for 100% of the overlap, led by CNR, BTU and HCC.
 CNRCore Natural Resources Inc. COM SHS | 0.69% | 4.02% | 0.69% |
|---|---|---|---|
 BTUPeabody Energy Corp. COM | 0.52% | 3.32% | 0.52% |
 HCCWarrior Met Coal Inc COM | 0.36% | 3.84% | 0.36% |
 AMRAlpha Metallurgical Resources Inc COM | 0.29% | 1.87% | 0.29% |
 KALUKaiser Aluminium Corporation COM PAR $0.01 | 0.25% | 2.49% | 0.25% |
 MTRNMaterion Corp COM | 0.17% | 3.82% | 0.17% |
 CENXCentury Aluminum Company COM | 0.16% | 3.17% | 0.16% |
 WSWorthington Steel Inc. COM SHS | 0.13% | 0.64% | 0.13% |
 MTUSMetallus Inc. COM | 0.08% | 0.46% | 0.08% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do IJS and XME overlap?
IJS and XME overlap by 2.6% of portfolio weight. They share 9 holdings (IJS holds 458 positions and XME holds 39), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both IJS and XME?
The two portfolios are 2.6% identical by weight. Owning both is genuine diversification: the funds hold almost none of the same securities.
What are the biggest shared holdings of IJS and XME?
The largest positions held by both funds are CNR, BTU, HCC, AMR and KALU. Together the top 9 shared positions account for 100% of the total overlap.
What does IJS own that XME doesn't?
449 positions (95.9% of IJS) are unique to IJS, led by EMN, LKQ and MTCH. In the other direction, 30 positions (76.3% of XME) are unique to XME.