IJT vs IWM: Holdings Overlap
IJTiShares S&P Small-Cap 600 Growth ETF
iShares · 341 holdings · $8.5B · as of 2026-03-31
iShares · 1941 holdings · $82.2B · as of 2026-03-31
How similar are IJT and IWM?
iShares S&P Small-Cap 600 Growth ETF (IJT, by iShares) holds 341 positions; iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM, by iShares) holds 1941. They have 306 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 28.4% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 28.4%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 306IJT holds 341 · IWM holds 1941
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- IJT 87%·IWM 28%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in IJT
35 of 341 positions (12.8% of the fund) are not held by IWM. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | IJT | IWM |
|---|---|---|
| Industrials | 22.0% | 17.9% |
| Health Care | 15.2% | 16.6% |
| Information Technology | 15.7% | 13.6% |
| Financials | 14.3% | 15.3% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 10.8% | 8.0% |
| Other Sectors | 20.3% | 22.7% |
| Unclassified | 1.0% | 5.5% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (1% of IJT, 5% of IWM).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IJT | +1.2% | +25.8% | +33.4% | +15.2% | +6.7% | +11.1% | 0.68% |
| IWM | +1.8% | +23.0% | +38.6% | +17.1% | +7.5% | +10.8% | 0.88% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in IJT vs IWM →
Shared Holdings(306)
The top 10 shared positions account for 9% of the overlap, led by PRIM, VIAV and FORM.
 PRIMPrimoris Services Corp. | 1.03% | 0.26% | 0.26% |
|---|---|---|---|
 VIAVViavi Solutions, Inc. | 1.02% | 0.26% | 0.26% |
 FORMFormFactor, Inc. | 1.00% | 0.26% | 0.26% |
 AGXArgan, Inc. | 1.00% | 0.25% | 0.25% |
 ESEESCO Technologies, Inc. | 0.97% | 0.25% | 0.25% |
 SMTCSemtech Corp. | 0.66% | 0.24% | 0.24% |
 SANMSanmina Corp. | 0.94% | 0.24% | 0.24% |
 ZWSZurn Elkay Water Solutions Corp. | 0.88% | 0.23% | 0.23% |
 JBTMJBT Marel Corp. | 0.88% | 0.23% | 0.23% |
 LUMNLumen Technologies, Inc. | 0.39% | 0.23% | 0.23% |
 DOCNDigitalOcean Holdings, Inc. | 0.90% | 0.22% | 0.22% |
 FSSFederal Signal Corp. | 0.87% | 0.22% | 0.22% |
 KRYSKrystal Biotech, Inc. | 0.88% | 0.22% | 0.22% |
 TRNOTerreno Realty Corp. | 0.59% | 0.21% | 0.21% |
 NENoble Corp. plc | 0.43% | 0.21% | 0.21% |
 EATBrinker International, Inc. | 0.82% | 0.21% | 0.21% |
 IBPInstalled Building Products, Inc. | 0.80% | 0.21% | 0.21% |
 PTGXProtagonist Therapeutics, Inc. | 0.82% | 0.21% | 0.21% |
 EPRTEssential Properties Realty Trust, Inc. | 0.57% | 0.20% | 0.20% |
 GKOSGlaukos Corp. | 0.57% | 0.20% | 0.20% |
 AROCArchrock, Inc. | 0.81% | 0.20% | 0.20% |
 SNEXStoneX Group, Inc. | 0.75% | 0.20% | 0.20% |
 ALKSAlkermes plc | 0.77% | 0.20% | 0.20% |
 RHPRyman Hospitality Properties, Inc. | 0.77% | 0.19% | 0.19% |
 VSATViasat, Inc. | 0.83% | 0.19% | 0.19% |
Showing the top 250 of 306 shared holdings by overlap weight.
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do IJT and IWM overlap?
IJT and IWM overlap by 28.4% of portfolio weight. They share 306 holdings (IJT holds 341 positions and IWM holds 1941), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both IJT and IWM?
The two portfolios are 28.4% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of IJT and IWM?
The largest positions held by both funds are PRIM, VIAV, FORM, AGX and ESE. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 9% of the total overlap.
What does IJT own that IWM doesn't?
35 positions (12.8% of IJT) are unique to IJT, led by AWI, ECG and MSGS. In the other direction, 1635 positions (71.3% of IWM) are unique to IWM.