IJT vs IWO: Holdings Overlap
IJTiShares S&P Small-Cap 600 Growth ETF
iShares · 341 holdings · $8.5B · as of 2026-03-31
IWOiShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF
iShares · 1101 holdings · $14.8B · as of 2026-03-31
How similar are IJT and IWO?
iShares S&P Small-Cap 600 Growth ETF (IJT, by iShares) holds 341 positions; iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF (IWO, by iShares) holds 1101. They have 223 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 35.5% identical. In practical terms the pair is moderately overlapping; they share a meaningful core, but each fund adds distinct exposure.
- Overlap by Weight
- 35.5%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 223IJT holds 341 · IWO holds 1101
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- IJT 70%·IWO 36%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in IJT
118 of 341 positions (29.3% of the fund) are not held by IWO. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Only in IWO
878 of 1101 positions (64.2% of the fund) are not held by IJT. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | IJT | IWO |
|---|---|---|
| Industrials | 22.0% | 23.7% |
| Health Care | 15.2% | 23.1% |
| Information Technology | 15.7% | 19.0% |
| Financials | 14.3% | 8.6% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 10.8% | 7.3% |
| Other Sectors | 20.3% | 14.1% |
| Unclassified | 1.0% | 4.0% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (1% of IJT, 4% of IWO).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IJT | +1.2% | +25.8% | +33.4% | +15.2% | +6.7% | +11.1% | 0.68% |
| IWO | +1.2% | +21.0% | +34.7% | +17.5% | +5.9% | +11.0% | 0.42% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in IJT vs IWO →
Shared Holdings(223)
The top 10 shared positions account for 13% of the overlap, led by VIAV, ESE and AGX.
1.02% | 0.51% | 0.51% | |
0.97% | 0.49% | 0.49% | |
1.00% | 0.49% | 0.49% | |
1.03% | 0.49% | 0.49% | |
0.66% | 0.48% | 0.48% | |
0.88% | 0.45% | 0.45% | |
0.90% | 0.44% | 0.44% | |
0.87% | 0.44% | 0.44% | |
0.88% | 0.43% | 0.43% | |
0.82% | 0.42% | 0.42% | |
0.80% | 0.41% | 0.41% | |
0.82% | 0.41% | 0.41% | |
0.57% | 0.40% | 0.40% | |
0.81% | 0.40% | 0.40% | |
0.75% | 0.40% | 0.40% | |
0.39% | 0.39% | 0.39% | |
0.77% | 0.38% | 0.38% | |
1.00% | 0.38% | 0.38% | |
0.43% | 0.37% | 0.37% | |
0.75% | 0.37% | 0.37% | |
0.37% | 0.36% | 0.36% | |
0.68% | 0.35% | 0.35% | |
0.66% | 0.34% | 0.34% | |
0.64% | 0.33% | 0.33% | |
0.60% | 0.32% | 0.32% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do IJT and IWO overlap?
IJT and IWO overlap by 35.5% of portfolio weight. They share 223 holdings (IJT holds 341 positions and IWO holds 1101), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both IJT and IWO?
The two portfolios are 35.5% identical by weight. Owning both is defensible: they share a meaningful core, but each fund adds exposure the other lacks.
What are the biggest shared holdings of IJT and IWO?
The largest positions held by both funds are VIAV, ESE, AGX, PRIM and SMTC. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 13% of the total overlap.
What does IJT own that IWO doesn't?
118 positions (29.3% of IJT) are unique to IJT, led by AWI, VSAT and ECG. In the other direction, 878 positions (64.2% of IWO) are unique to IWO.