IJT vs IWP: Holdings Overlap
IJTiShares S&P Small-Cap 600 Growth ETF
iShares · 341 holdings · $8.5B · as of 2026-03-31
IWPiShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF
iShares · 277 holdings · $20.5B · as of 2026-03-31
How similar are IJT and IWP?
iShares S&P Small-Cap 600 Growth ETF (IJT, by iShares) holds 341 positions; iShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF (IWP, by iShares) holds 277. They have 13 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 0.8% identical. In practical terms the pair is essentially distinct, holding almost none of the same securities.
- Overlap by Weight
- 0.8%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 13IJT holds 341 · IWP holds 277
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- IJT 5%·IWP 1%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in IJT
328 of 341 positions (94.5% of the fund) are not held by IWP. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Only in IWP
264 of 277 positions (99.1% of the fund) are not held by IJT. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | IJT | IWP |
|---|---|---|
| Industrials | 22.0% | 24.4% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 10.8% | 21.2% |
| Information Technology | 15.7% | 15.6% |
| Health Care | 15.2% | 14.9% |
| Financials | 14.3% | 8.5% |
| Other Sectors | 20.3% | 15.3% |
| Unclassified | 1.0% | 0.0% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (1% of IJT, 0% of IWP).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IJT | +1.2% | +25.8% | +33.4% | +15.2% | +6.7% | +11.1% | 0.68% |
| IWP | +1.5% | +5.4% | +3.1% | +14.6% | +5.1% | +12.1% | 0.34% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in IJT vs IWP →
Shared Holdings(13)
The top 10 shared positions account for 93% of the overlap, led by 1JK, CORT and RNG.
0.55% | 0.16% | 0.16% | |
0.50% | 0.14% | 0.14% | |
0.22% | 0.10% | 0.10% | |
0.65% | 0.10% | 0.10% | |
0.94% | 0.07% | 0.07% | |
0.18% | 0.06% | 0.06% | |
0.18% | 0.05% | 0.05% | |
0.70% | 0.03% | 0.03% | |
0.22% | 0.03% | 0.03% | |
0.24% | 0.03% | 0.03% | |
0.10% | 0.02% | 0.02% | |
0.18% | 0.02% | 0.02% | |
0.24% | 0.01% | 0.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do IJT and IWP overlap?
IJT and IWP overlap by 0.8% of portfolio weight. They share 13 holdings (IJT holds 341 positions and IWP holds 277), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both IJT and IWP?
The two portfolios are 0.8% identical by weight. Owning both is genuine diversification: the funds hold almost none of the same securities.
What are the biggest shared holdings of IJT and IWP?
The largest positions held by both funds are 1JK, CORT, RNG, ETSY and AWI. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 93% of the total overlap.
What does IJT own that IWP doesn't?
328 positions (94.5% of IJT) are unique to IJT, led by PRIM, VIAV and AGX. In the other direction, 264 positions (99.1% of IWP) are unique to IWP.