IJT vs PAVE: Holdings Overlap
IJTiShares S&P Small-Cap 600 Growth ETF
iShares · 341 holdings · $8.5B · as of 2026-03-31
PAVEGlobal X U.S. Infrastructure Development ETF
Global X · 100 holdings · $14.1B · as of 2026-05-31
Holdings snapshots are 61 days apart (IJT: 2026-03-31, PAVE: 2026-05-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are IJT and PAVE?
iShares S&P Small-Cap 600 Growth ETF (IJT, by iShares) holds 341 positions; Global X U.S. Infrastructure Development ETF (PAVE, by Global X) holds 100. They have 16 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 5.2% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 5.2%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 16IJT holds 341 · PAVE holds 100
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- IJT 9%·PAVE 6%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in IJT
325 of 341 positions (90.8% of the fund) are not held by PAVE. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Only in PAVE
84 of 100 positions (94.2% of the fund) are not held by IJT. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | IJT | PAVE |
|---|---|---|
| Industrials | 22.0% | 75.1% |
| Materials | 2.4% | 20.3% |
| Information Technology | 15.7% | 1.1% |
| Health Care | 15.2% | 0.0% |
| Financials | 14.3% | 0.0% |
| Other Sectors | 28.7% | 3.1% |
| Unclassified | 1.0% | 0.3% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (1% of IJT, 0% of PAVE).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IJT | +1.2% | +25.8% | +33.4% | +15.2% | +6.7% | +11.1% | 0.68% |
| PAVE | +4.0% | +23.0% | +29.9% | +22.7% | +18.1% | — | 0.73% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in IJT vs PAVE →
Shared Holdings(16)
The top 10 shared positions account for 77% of the overlap, led by POWL, MYRG and AGX.
0.68% | 0.56% | 0.56% | |
0.58% | 0.51% | 0.51% | |
1.00% | 0.50% | 0.50% | |
0.80% | 0.45% | 0.45% | |
0.88% | 0.43% | 0.43% | |
1.03% | 0.37% | 0.37% | |
0.44% | 0.34% | 0.34% | |
0.69% | 0.32% | 0.32% | |
0.37% | 0.26% | 0.26% | |
0.25% | 0.38% | 0.25% | |
0.33% | 0.25% | 0.25% | |
0.24% | 0.30% | 0.24% | |
0.22% | 0.41% | 0.22% | |
0.60% | 0.20% | 0.20% | |
0.39% | 0.20% | 0.20% | |
0.08% | 0.28% | 0.08% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do IJT and PAVE overlap?
IJT and PAVE overlap by 5.2% of portfolio weight. They share 16 holdings (IJT holds 341 positions and PAVE holds 100), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both IJT and PAVE?
The two portfolios are 5.2% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of IJT and PAVE?
The largest positions held by both funds are POWL, MYRG, AGX, ECG and ZWS. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 77% of the total overlap.
What does IJT own that PAVE doesn't?
325 positions (90.8% of IJT) are unique to IJT, led by VIAV, FORM and ESE. In the other direction, 84 positions (94.2% of PAVE) are unique to PAVE.