ILF vs EWW: Holdings Overlap
ILFiShares Latin America 40 ETF
iShares · 44 holdings · $3.8B · as of 2026-03-31
iShares · 41 holdings · $2.0B · as of 2026-05-31
Holdings snapshots are 61 days apart (ILF: 2026-03-31, EWW: 2026-05-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are ILF and EWW?
iShares Latin America 40 ETF (ILF, by iShares) holds 44 positions; iShares MSCI Mexico ETF (EWW, by iShares) holds 41. They have 11 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 23.8% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 23.8%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 11ILF holds 44 · EWW holds 41
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- ILF 24%·EWW 60%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in ILF
33 of 44 positions (75.6% of the fund) are not held by EWW. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Only in EWW
30 of 41 positions (40.1% of the fund) are not held by ILF.
4FOIndustrias Penoles SAB de CV4.63%
GAPBGrupo Aeroportuario Del Pacifico S.A.B. de C.V. COM NPV SER'B'3.72%
ASURBGrupo Aeroportuario del Sureste S.A.B. de C.V. SER'B'NPV2.35%
FIBRAPLPrologis Property Mexico SA de CV2.31%
GFINBUROGrupo Financiero Inbursa SAB de CV1.78%
- Grupo Aeroportuario del Centro Norte S.A.B. de C.V. SER'B' NPV1.65%
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | ILF | EWW |
|---|---|---|
| Financials | 36.9% | 9.6% |
| Materials | 21.4% | 23.7% |
| Consumer Staples | 9.4% | 17.5% |
| Energy | 13.0% | 0.0% |
| Industrials | 6.6% | 8.1% |
| Other Sectors | 11.0% | 15.3% |
| Unclassified | 1.2% | 25.6% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (1% of ILF, 26% of EWW).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ILF | +2.7% | +15.2% | +38.5% | +14.3% | +10.7% | +7.1% | 3.41% |
| EWW | +3.3% | +13.5% | +30.0% | +11.0% | +13.3% | +7.2% | 3.18% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in ILF vs EWW →
Shared Holdings(11)
The top 10 shared positions account for 100% of the overlap, led by GMEXICOB, GFNORTEO and AMXB.
5.16% | 14.27% | 5.16% | |
4.15% | 9.62% | 4.15% | |
3.56% | 8.09% | 3.56% | |
2.89% | 7.10% | 2.89% | |
2.69% | 4.86% | 2.69% | |
2.43% | 5.40% | 2.43% | |
0.88% | 2.97% | 0.88% | |
0.71% | 2.02% | 0.71% | |
0.69% | 2.24% | 0.69% | |
| Grupo Carso SAB de CV | 0.63% | 2.05% | 0.63% |
| MEXICAN NUEVO PESO | 0.03% | 1.14% | 0.03% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do ILF and EWW overlap?
ILF and EWW overlap by 23.8% of portfolio weight. They share 11 holdings (ILF holds 44 positions and EWW holds 41), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both ILF and EWW?
The two portfolios are 23.8% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of ILF and EWW?
The largest positions held by both funds are GMEXICOB, GFNORTEO, AMXB, FEMSAUBD and CEMEXCPO. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 100% of the total overlap.
What does ILF own that EWW doesn't?
33 positions (75.6% of ILF) are unique to ILF, led by VALE, NU and ITUB. In the other direction, 30 positions (40.1% of EWW) are unique to EWW.