ILF vs IXG: Holdings Overlap
ILFiShares Latin America 40 ETF
iShares · 44 holdings · $3.8B · as of 2026-03-31
IXGiShares Global Financials ETF
iShares · 235 holdings · $699M · as of 2026-03-31
How similar are ILF and IXG?
iShares Latin America 40 ETF (ILF, by iShares) holds 44 positions; iShares Global Financials ETF (IXG, by iShares) holds 235. They have 14 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 1.8% identical. In practical terms the pair is essentially distinct, holding almost none of the same securities.
- Overlap by Weight
- 1.8%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 14ILF holds 44 · IXG holds 235
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- ILF 37%·IXG 2%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in ILF
30 of 44 positions (62.4% of the fund) are not held by IXG.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | ILF | IXG |
|---|---|---|
| Financials | 36.9% | 99.3% |
| Materials | 21.4% | 0.0% |
| Energy | 13.0% | 0.0% |
| Consumer Staples | 9.4% | 0.0% |
| Industrials | 6.6% | 0.0% |
| Other Sectors | 11.0% | 0.2% |
| Unclassified | 1.2% | 0.0% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (1% of ILF, 0% of IXG).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ILF | +2.7% | +15.2% | +38.5% | +14.3% | +10.7% | +7.1% | 3.41% |
| IXG | +4.2% | +13.1% | +23.8% | +25.1% | +14.4% | +13.3% | 2.10% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in ILF vs IXG →
Shared Holdings(14)
The top 10 shared positions account for 97% of the overlap, led by NU, ITUB and GFNORTEO.
8.50% | 0.40% | 0.40% | |
7.02% | 0.33% | 0.33% | |
4.15% | 0.20% | 0.20% | |
3.57% | 0.17% | 0.17% | |
2.99% | 0.14% | 0.14% | |
2.90% | 0.14% | 0.14% | |
2.43% | 0.11% | 0.11% | |
1.97% | 0.09% | 0.09% | |
1.31% | 0.06% | 0.06% | |
1.26% | 0.06% | 0.06% | |
0.80% | 0.04% | 0.04% | |
| CHILEAN PESO | 0.06% | 0.01% | 0.01% |
| BRAZIALIAN REAL | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| MEXICAN NUEVO PESO | 0.03% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do ILF and IXG overlap?
ILF and IXG overlap by 1.8% of portfolio weight. They share 14 holdings (ILF holds 44 positions and IXG holds 235), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both ILF and IXG?
The two portfolios are 1.8% identical by weight. Owning both is genuine diversification: the funds hold almost none of the same securities.
What are the biggest shared holdings of ILF and IXG?
The largest positions held by both funds are NU, ITUB, GFNORTEO, BAP and BBD. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 97% of the total overlap.
What does ILF own that IXG doesn't?
30 positions (62.4% of ILF) are unique to ILF, led by VALE, PBR-A and PBR. In the other direction, 221 positions (97.8% of IXG) are unique to IXG.