IMTM vs IPAC: Holdings Overlap
IMTMiShares MSCI Intl Momentum Factor ETF
iShares · 313 holdings · $4.2B · as of 2026-04-30
IPACiShares Core MSCI Pacific ETF
iShares · 1375 holdings · $2.7B · as of 2026-04-30
How similar are IMTM and IPAC?
iShares MSCI Intl Momentum Factor ETF (IMTM, by iShares) holds 313 positions; iShares Core MSCI Pacific ETF (IPAC, by iShares) holds 1375. They have 122 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 27.9% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 27.9%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 122IMTM holds 313 · IPAC holds 1375
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- IMTM 29%·IPAC 43%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in IMTM
191 of 313 positions (70.0% of the fund) are not held by IPAC. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Only in IPAC
1253 of 1375 positions (56.0% of the fund) are not held by IMTM. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | IMTM | IPAC |
|---|---|---|
| Financials | 36.0% | 20.1% |
| Industrials | 20.2% | 15.3% |
| Information Technology | 10.0% | 9.0% |
| Materials | 8.4% | 6.3% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 1.9% | 7.5% |
| Other Sectors | 18.3% | 18.9% |
| Unclassified | 4.6% | 22.2% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (5% of IMTM, 22% of IPAC).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IMTM | +2.7% | +12.9% | +21.7% | +21.3% | +10.1% | +10.4% | 4.34% |
| IPAC | +4.8% | +18.9% | +27.2% | +18.2% | +9.0% | +9.1% | 3.71% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in IMTM vs IPAC →
Shared Holdings(122)
The top 10 shared positions account for 35% of the overlap, led by 6857, 9984 and 7011.
1.73% | 1.56% | 1.56% | |
1.18% | 1.38% | 1.18% | |
1.01% | 1.04% | 1.01% | |
0.99% | 1.59% | 0.99% | |
0.98% | 1.17% | 0.98% | |
0.92% | 1.41% | 0.92% | |
0.89% | 1.05% | 0.89% | |
0.78% | 1.44% | 0.78% | |
0.76% | 0.83% | 0.76% | |
0.75% | 1.25% | 0.75% | |
0.74% | 2.21% | 0.74% | |
0.73% | 1.12% | 0.73% | |
0.71% | 2.19% | 0.71% | |
0.90% | 0.63% | 0.63% | |
0.55% | 1.04% | 0.55% | |
0.53% | 0.60% | 0.53% | |
0.65% | 0.51% | 0.51% | |
0.65% | 0.50% | 0.50% | |
0.49% | 1.01% | 0.49% | |
0.40% | 0.63% | 0.40% | |
0.40% | 0.49% | 0.40% | |
0.39% | 0.37% | 0.37% | |
0.36% | 0.44% | 0.36% | |
0.35% | 0.59% | 0.35% | |
0.33% | 0.60% | 0.33% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do IMTM and IPAC overlap?
IMTM and IPAC overlap by 27.9% of portfolio weight. They share 122 holdings (IMTM holds 313 positions and IPAC holds 1375), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both IMTM and IPAC?
The two portfolios are 27.9% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of IMTM and IPAC?
The largest positions held by both funds are 6857, 9984, 7011, 6501 and 8411. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 35% of the total overlap.
What does IMTM own that IPAC doesn't?
191 positions (70.0% of IMTM) are unique to IMTM, led by ASML, HSBA and SAN. In the other direction, 1253 positions (56.0% of IPAC) are unique to IPAC.